<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spamouflage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seoblackhat.com/2005/09/20/spamouflage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2005/09/20/spamouflage/</link>
	<description>Tired of useless Top 10 Lists for ranking in Google? Looking for effective and insightful info? SEO Black Hat Blog offers articles on Blackhat SEO, Linkbait &#038; Link Spamming. And if you need to escape White Hat SEO Whiners, check out he Private Black Hat Search Engine Optimization Forum.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:26:23 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Do You Belong To The Black Hat Monkeys Community &#8212; Black Hat SEO Diary</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2005/09/20/spamouflage/comment-page-1/#comment-6916</link>
		<dc:creator>Do You Belong To The Black Hat Monkeys Community &#8212; Black Hat SEO Diary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 19:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2005/09/20/comment-spamming/#comment-6916</guid>
		<description>[...] Think for yourself. Read this post. Think about it. Now read this one. Now you go and read this blog for 6 months and then come back. You may be a couple of steps closer to becoming a successful Black Hat SEO. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Think for yourself. Read this post. Think about it. Now read this one. Now you go and read this blog for 6 months and then come back. You may be a couple of steps closer to becoming a successful Black Hat SEO. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: preach</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2005/09/20/spamouflage/comment-page-1/#comment-257</link>
		<dc:creator>preach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2005 13:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2005/09/20/comment-spamming/#comment-257</guid>
		<description>Well I don&#039;t think spamouflage is for hurting other sites. From my personal experience I can say that adding links to authority sites gives you a small boost in the serp&#039;s (I guess many of you know this) - and this is what they may be trying to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I don&#8217;t think spamouflage is for hurting other sites. From my personal experience I can say that adding links to authority sites gives you a small boost in the serp&#8217;s (I guess many of you know this) &#8211; and this is what they may be trying to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marco</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2005/09/20/spamouflage/comment-page-1/#comment-252</link>
		<dc:creator>Marco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2005 07:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2005/09/20/comment-spamming/#comment-252</guid>
		<description>Interesting analysis. Thanks for adding it to your blog! It makes a bit more sense to me now I guess. It became pretty clear to me that centralized blacklists are becoming a dead end pretty soon. I never liked them anyway because they tend to falsely block comments if wrongly configured and at the same time they let a significant proportion of linkspam pass through.

As for the last paragraph: I don&#039;t think there&#039;s much benefit in getting a blogger (me, or anyone else) &#039;penalized&#039; by google. Most bloggers don&#039;t have such high pageranks anyway and more important: most bloggers don&#039;t even care for pagerank because we tend to publish on many different subjects anyway which aren&#039;t closely related like material on for example a baby clothing merchant website. A blogger gets most of his traffic from other blogs linking to him and from tag index sites such as Technorati. Visitors arriving through Google are of very little importance because they tend to arrive randomly and land on your blog mostly by accident while looking for something. Because of this I don&#039;t think search engine optimization really matters all that much to bloggers. Link-count on Technorati or similar sites is much more important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting analysis. Thanks for adding it to your blog! It makes a bit more sense to me now I guess. It became pretty clear to me that centralized blacklists are becoming a dead end pretty soon. I never liked them anyway because they tend to falsely block comments if wrongly configured and at the same time they let a significant proportion of linkspam pass through.</p>
<p>As for the last paragraph: I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s much benefit in getting a blogger (me, or anyone else) &#8216;penalized&#8217; by google. Most bloggers don&#8217;t have such high pageranks anyway and more important: most bloggers don&#8217;t even care for pagerank because we tend to publish on many different subjects anyway which aren&#8217;t closely related like material on for example a baby clothing merchant website. A blogger gets most of his traffic from other blogs linking to him and from tag index sites such as Technorati. Visitors arriving through Google are of very little importance because they tend to arrive randomly and land on your blog mostly by accident while looking for something. Because of this I don&#8217;t think search engine optimization really matters all that much to bloggers. Link-count on Technorati or similar sites is much more important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
