<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Exposed as Worst Search Engine!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seoblackhat.com/2005/12/26/google-exposed-as-worst-search-engine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2005/12/26/google-exposed-as-worst-search-engine/</link>
	<description>Tired of useless Top 10 Lists for ranking in Google? Looking for effective and insightful info? SEO Black Hat Blog offers articles on Blackhat SEO, Linkbait &#38; Link Spamming. And if you need to escape White Hat SEO Whiners, check out he Private Black Hat Search Engine Optimization Forum.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 05:07:23 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SEO Black Hat: Black Hat SEO Blog Top 10 Reasons To Sell Google’s Stock</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2005/12/26/google-exposed-as-worst-search-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-1292</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Black Hat: Black Hat SEO Blog Top 10 Reasons To Sell Google’s Stock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 18:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/?p=201#comment-1292</guid>
		<description>[...] Today I’m going to talk again about why, even though Google is a great company, their stock is overpriced and should be sold if your want to protect your portfolio’s value. Sure I said it before (when their stock was $80 higher per share), but this time I’m going to lay it out in even more detail. Hopefully this won’t be the straw that breaks the Googlebots back and gets my site banned. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Today I’m going to talk again about why, even though Google is a great company, their stock is overpriced and should be sold if your want to protect your portfolio’s value. Sure I said it before (when their stock was $80 higher per share), but this time I’m going to lay it out in even more detail. Hopefully this won’t be the straw that breaks the Googlebots back and gets my site banned. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; THE FUTURE OF SEO Army Of Blogs Resource Center</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2005/12/26/google-exposed-as-worst-search-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-879</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; THE FUTURE OF SEO Army Of Blogs Resource Center</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2006 18:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/?p=201#comment-879</guid>
		<description>[...] Specialty search engines will be on the rise, and there is good reasons for this. Currently the serps on Google, and Yahoo! have become a royal mess! Finding relevant content is very difficult, and you can not blame spammers for this! Google in particular as tightened it&#8217;s algo so much to fight spam that it has become the worse search engine for relevancy as proven by various experiments by individual seo webmasters who monitor the top 3 search engines for relevance. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Specialty search engines will be on the rise, and there is good reasons for this. Currently the serps on Google, and Yahoo! have become a royal mess! Finding relevant content is very difficult, and you can not blame spammers for this! Google in particular as tightened it&#8217;s algo so much to fight spam that it has become the worse search engine for relevancy as proven by various experiments by individual seo webmasters who monitor the top 3 search engines for relevance. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Managed Dedicated Servers @ Dataracks</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2005/12/26/google-exposed-as-worst-search-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-840</link>
		<dc:creator>Managed Dedicated Servers @ Dataracks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2005 17:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/?p=201#comment-840</guid>
		<description>LOL. I knew this was going to happen. I made a bet on this, let&#039;s see how it pans out. (Think Options and selling short)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL. I knew this was going to happen. I made a bet on this, let&#8217;s see how it pans out. (Think Options and selling short)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 301powered</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2005/12/26/google-exposed-as-worst-search-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-831</link>
		<dc:creator>301powered</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2005 19:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/?p=201#comment-831</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not referral spam, only targeted visitors ..

&quot;I have 655 referrals in my referral log from them – the most of any site this month&quot;
Sorry if you can&#039;t make targeted traffic ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not referral spam, only targeted visitors ..</p>
<p>&#8220;I have 655 referrals in my referral log from them – the most of any site this month&#8221;<br />
Sorry if you can&#8217;t make targeted traffic <img src='http://seoblackhat.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sorry Matt</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2005/12/26/google-exposed-as-worst-search-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-830</link>
		<dc:creator>sorry Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/?p=201#comment-830</guid>
		<description>Nice try Matt, but the fact is that Google HAS lost relevance in it&#039;s results over the past year. I&#039;m not willing to say it&#039;s the worst yet, but I can say without reservation that (for truely relevant informational type results) I now have to use alternative SEs to get the information I am looking for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice try Matt, but the fact is that Google HAS lost relevance in it&#8217;s results over the past year. I&#8217;m not willing to say it&#8217;s the worst yet, but I can say without reservation that (for truely relevant informational type results) I now have to use alternative SEs to get the information I am looking for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2005/12/26/google-exposed-as-worst-search-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-828</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2005 04:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/?p=201#comment-828</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s because the &lt;a href=&quot;http://216.239.51.104/search?q=cache:0pae2dYSPfYJ:seoblackhat.com/+site:seoblackhat.com&amp;hl=en&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Latest Cache&lt;/a&gt; for this site in google is &quot;Redirect your way out of the sandbox&quot; on December 13th, 2005.

Everything since hasn&#039;t been spidered yet. Give it some time and you might rank in the top 100.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s because the <a href="http://216.239.51.104/search?q=cache:0pae2dYSPfYJ:seoblackhat.com/+site:seoblackhat.com&amp;hl=en" rel="nofollow">Latest Cache</a> for this site in google is &#8220;Redirect your way out of the sandbox&#8221; on December 13th, 2005.</p>
<p>Everything since hasn&#8217;t been spidered yet. Give it some time and you might rank in the top 100.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QuadsZilla</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2005/12/26/google-exposed-as-worst-search-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-827</link>
		<dc:creator>QuadsZilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2005 23:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/?p=201#comment-827</guid>
		<description>Well, I didn’t exactly try to spam my way to the top. I barely even bend the rules on this domain - I don’t want to make it morally easy to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-dreams/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;fulfill your SEO dreams&lt;/a&gt;.  

It was interesting to see wolf-howl rank number 1 and we can certainly take notes from this experiment as to what G, Y and MS are looking for in their algorithm.  

To be sure, my gripe is more about G showing the 301powered result to the exclusion of seoblackhat – you know what it’s like to be googlewashed, matt.

Congrats on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.searchenginejournal.com/index.php?p=2696&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;winning best SEO blog&lt;/a&gt;.  I wish you and your family a safe and happy holiday week.

-q</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I didn’t exactly try to spam my way to the top. I barely even bend the rules on this domain &#8211; I don’t want to make it morally easy to <a href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-dreams/" rel="nofollow">fulfill your SEO dreams</a>.  </p>
<p>It was interesting to see wolf-howl rank number 1 and we can certainly take notes from this experiment as to what G, Y and MS are looking for in their algorithm.  </p>
<p>To be sure, my gripe is more about G showing the 301powered result to the exclusion of seoblackhat – you know what it’s like to be googlewashed, matt.</p>
<p>Congrats on <a href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/index.php?p=2696" rel="nofollow">winning best SEO blog</a>.  I wish you and your family a safe and happy holiday week.</p>
<p>-q</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Cutts</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2005/12/26/google-exposed-as-worst-search-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-826</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Cutts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2005 22:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/?p=201#comment-826</guid>
		<description>Hmm. Weren&#039;t you trying to spam to the top for this query with your South Park call to action? I&#039;d say it&#039;s not so bad that it didn&#039;t work. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm. Weren&#8217;t you trying to spam to the top for this query with your South Park call to action? I&#8217;d say it&#8217;s not so bad that it didn&#8217;t work. <img src='http://seoblackhat.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

