The Los Angeles Times is Full of Crap

I’ve known for a while the Los Angeles Times is full of crap, and Monday’s debacle reinforces that belief. As you probably know, Google has said:
We have many PC partners who serve their markets exceedingly well and we see no need to enter that market,” a Google spokesman told Times Online. “We would rather […]

The Los Angeles Times is Full of Crap

comments below

I’ve known for a while the Los Angeles Times is full of crap, and Monday’s debacle reinforces that belief. As you probably know, Google has said:

We have many PC partners who serve their markets exceedingly well and we see no need to enter that market,” a Google spokesman told Times Online. “We would rather partner with great companies.

 

It didn’t sound all that plausible (Google entering the PC arena), but for some reason I thought that because it was reported by the Los Angeles Times that it had some validity.

I guess not.

What a pile. I guess that puts the Los Angeles Times one rung below Ala Shiban. At least with Ala, we only think he’s full of crap.

bookmark this article:
  • reddit
  • digg
  • netscape
  • del.icio.us

2 Responses to “The Los Angeles Times is Full of Crap”

 

Thats really strange, what’s the point of putting BS news like that in print if the repercussions outweigh the rewards.

Hah! :D Man, I really don’t like being called crap and all :P (the story about IBM and MS’s costs is true by the way…)

Keep up with the good work guys

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.