<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google is Right to Not Trust Paid Links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seoblackhat.com/2006/03/31/google-is-right-to-not-trust-paid-links/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/03/31/google-is-right-to-not-trust-paid-links/</link>
	<description>Tired of useless Top 10 Lists for ranking in Google? Looking for effective and insightful info? SEO Black Hat Blog offers articles on Blackhat SEO, Linkbait &#038; Link Spamming. And if you need to escape White Hat SEO Whiners, check out he Private Black Hat Search Engine Optimization Forum.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:33:19 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: e</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/03/31/google-is-right-to-not-trust-paid-links/comment-page-1/#comment-2682</link>
		<dc:creator>e</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 07:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/?p=252#comment-2682</guid>
		<description>thats why I have been working with various people on a project which is basically like googles adsense ads, except the links are spiderable (e.g. no javascript).  no on really makes money with this by buying/selling links; in the end it does throw a wrench in googles ranking system--it just helps advertise and boost peoples rankings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thats why I have been working with various people on a project which is basically like googles adsense ads, except the links are spiderable (e.g. no javascript).  no on really makes money with this by buying/selling links; in the end it does throw a wrench in googles ranking system&#8211;it just helps advertise and boost peoples rankings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Omdahl</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/03/31/google-is-right-to-not-trust-paid-links/comment-page-1/#comment-1642</link>
		<dc:creator>James Omdahl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 23:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/?p=252#comment-1642</guid>
		<description>Great post.

I am with you QuadsZilla - paid links, no matter how you defend them, are primarily there to fool the search engines.

I think a lot of marketers will be happy to wean themselves off of the paid links.  I know I love not sending that money over to TLA every month.

I am not sure if it has been stated before here, but our affiliates have done some experimentation and found that any paid links on newspaper and radio sites do not pass link juice.

So if you have &#039;em, cancel &#039;em.  Let some other sucker pay for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post.</p>
<p>I am with you QuadsZilla &#8211; paid links, no matter how you defend them, are primarily there to fool the search engines.</p>
<p>I think a lot of marketers will be happy to wean themselves off of the paid links.  I know I love not sending that money over to TLA every month.</p>
<p>I am not sure if it has been stated before here, but our affiliates have done some experimentation and found that any paid links on newspaper and radio sites do not pass link juice.</p>
<p>So if you have &#8216;em, cancel &#8216;em.  Let some other sucker pay for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QuadsZilla</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/03/31/google-is-right-to-not-trust-paid-links/comment-page-1/#comment-1640</link>
		<dc:creator>QuadsZilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 17:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/?p=252#comment-1640</guid>
		<description>Amnestic:  Google givith, and Google taketh away.  The value of advertising on a website before Google had nothing to do with SERPs - it was how many page views and click throughs you had.

It would make sense for Google to discount links from any of the standard banner sizes. So I would reccommend against using standard sized banners if you want it to count with Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amnestic:  Google givith, and Google taketh away.  The value of advertising on a website before Google had nothing to do with SERPs &#8211; it was how many page views and click throughs you had.</p>
<p>It would make sense for Google to discount links from any of the standard banner sizes. So I would reccommend against using standard sized banners if you want it to count with Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QuadsZilla</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/03/31/google-is-right-to-not-trust-paid-links/comment-page-1/#comment-1639</link>
		<dc:creator>QuadsZilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 17:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/?p=252#comment-1639</guid>
		<description>Peter: Yea, I did a &lt;a href=&quot;http://seoblackhat.com/2005/08/29/devalue-link-google-algorithm/&quot;&gt;post about that&lt;/a&gt; when the talk of this first came up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter: Yea, I did a <a href="http://seoblackhat.com/2005/08/29/devalue-link-google-algorithm/">post about that</a> when the talk of this first came up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amnesic</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/03/31/google-is-right-to-not-trust-paid-links/comment-page-1/#comment-1638</link>
		<dc:creator>Amnesic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 15:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/?p=252#comment-1638</guid>
		<description>Banner spot are almost the same as link if you link use alt tag. Those that mean that they just banned self managed advertising?

The value of every website just droped because google said so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Banner spot are almost the same as link if you link use alt tag. Those that mean that they just banned self managed advertising?</p>
<p>The value of every website just droped because google said so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter T Davis</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/03/31/google-is-right-to-not-trust-paid-links/comment-page-1/#comment-1637</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter T Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 12:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/?p=252#comment-1637</guid>
		<description>So how do you figure Google is going to tell the difference between paid and unpaid links?  I would guess that this is just going to change how paid links are placed.  Instead of having a list of links under a &quot;sponsors&quot; heading, paid links will be blended into the content.  But, you already knew that, didn&#039;t you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So how do you figure Google is going to tell the difference between paid and unpaid links?  I would guess that this is just going to change how paid links are placed.  Instead of having a list of links under a &#8220;sponsors&#8221; heading, paid links will be blended into the content.  But, you already knew that, didn&#8217;t you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
