<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rsnake on Detecting Cloaking in Apache</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seoblackhat.com/2006/04/25/rsnake-on-detecting-cloaking-in-apache/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/04/25/rsnake-on-detecting-cloaking-in-apache/</link>
	<description>Tired of useless Top 10 Lists for ranking in Google? Looking for effective and insightful info? SEO Black Hat Blog offers articles on Blackhat SEO, Linkbait &#38; Link Spamming. And if you need to escape White Hat SEO Whiners, check out he Private Black Hat Search Engine Optimization Forum.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 05:07:23 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sadgfh</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/04/25/rsnake-on-detecting-cloaking-in-apache/comment-page-1/#comment-7233</link>
		<dc:creator>sadgfh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 13:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2006/04/25/rsnake-on-detecting-cloaking-in-apache/#comment-7233</guid>
		<description>so why can&#039;t we use random generated/rotated etags to bring indexers to pages?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so why can&#8217;t we use random generated/rotated etags to bring indexers to pages?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jsirovic</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/04/25/rsnake-on-detecting-cloaking-in-apache/comment-page-1/#comment-2057</link>
		<dc:creator>jsirovic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 20:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2006/04/25/rsnake-on-detecting-cloaking-in-apache/#comment-2057</guid>
		<description>I posted a related issue here -&gt;

http://www.seoegghead.com/blog/search-engine-optimization/what-mod_rewrite-wont-do-for-you-C6/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I posted a related issue here -&gt;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.seoegghead.com/blog/search-engine-optimization/what-mod_rewrite-wont-do-for-you-C6/" rel="nofollow">http://www.seoegghead.com/blog/search-engine-optimization/what-mod_rewrite-wont-do-for-you-C6/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scottj</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/04/25/rsnake-on-detecting-cloaking-in-apache/comment-page-1/#comment-2053</link>
		<dc:creator>scottj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 19:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2006/04/25/rsnake-on-detecting-cloaking-in-apache/#comment-2053</guid>
		<description>Even if the ETag header is being checked, it would be very easy to avoid.  Simply make sure that NOTHING from your site is served with ETags...even those icons.  You know, you can always delete the icons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if the ETag header is being checked, it would be very easy to avoid.  Simply make sure that NOTHING from your site is served with ETags&#8230;even those icons.  You know, you can always delete the icons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kloakit</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/04/25/rsnake-on-detecting-cloaking-in-apache/comment-page-1/#comment-2049</link>
		<dc:creator>kloakit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 22:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2006/04/25/rsnake-on-detecting-cloaking-in-apache/#comment-2049</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think the ETag header can be used reliably to flag cloaked pages, because it isn&#039;t used widely enough.  My tests with some Apache 1.3.33 servers show it isn&#039;t being used there.  I&#039;ve checked around and use is fairly spotty.  It just isn&#039;t ubiquitous enough to rely on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the ETag header can be used reliably to flag cloaked pages, because it isn&#8217;t used widely enough.  My tests with some Apache 1.3.33 servers show it isn&#8217;t being used there.  I&#8217;ve checked around and use is fairly spotty.  It just isn&#8217;t ubiquitous enough to rely on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

