<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cheating Adsense &#8211; Clickfraud</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seoblackhat.com/2006/05/02/cheating-adsense-clickfraud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/05/02/cheating-adsense-clickfraud/</link>
	<description>Tired of useless Top 10 Lists for ranking in Google? Looking for effective and insightful info? SEO Black Hat Blog offers articles on Blackhat SEO, Linkbait &#38; Link Spamming. And if you need to escape White Hat SEO Whiners, check out he Private Black Hat Search Engine Optimization Forum.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 05:07:23 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rjonesx</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/05/02/cheating-adsense-clickfraud/comment-page-1/#comment-2082</link>
		<dc:creator>rjonesx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 21:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/?p=276#comment-2082</guid>
		<description>With this and Adsense Bowling (http://www.thegooglecache.com/?p=5) it looks like both Publishers and Advertisers are getting the short end of the stick, while Google laughs its way to the bank.

The problem is that even with a % being attributed to click-fraud, it still does not mean that it is not profitable. The PPC economy will shift to take this into account, just as shopping mall deals with loiterers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With this and Adsense Bowling (<a href="http://www.thegooglecache.com/?p=5" rel="nofollow">http://www.thegooglecache.com/?p=5</a>) it looks like both Publishers and Advertisers are getting the short end of the stick, while Google laughs its way to the bank.</p>
<p>The problem is that even with a % being attributed to click-fraud, it still does not mean that it is not profitable. The PPC economy will shift to take this into account, just as shopping mall deals with loiterers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sasa</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/05/02/cheating-adsense-clickfraud/comment-page-1/#comment-2074</link>
		<dc:creator>sasa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 20:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/?p=276#comment-2074</guid>
		<description>I think you are right in saying that &quot;PPC is a house of cards waiting to fall&quot;. Whenever there will be to much fraud for the major players they will shift to a PPC format where the C stands for Conversion. And they will probably earn even more that way ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are right in saying that &#8220;PPC is a house of cards waiting to fall&#8221;. Whenever there will be to much fraud for the major players they will shift to a PPC format where the C stands for Conversion. And they will probably earn even more that way <img src='http://seoblackhat.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

