<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tutorial: Make More Money on Your Sites with a Mouse Trap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seoblackhat.com/2006/05/10/tutorial-make-more-money-on-your-sites-with-this-mouse-trap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/05/10/tutorial-make-more-money-on-your-sites-with-this-mouse-trap/</link>
	<description>Tired of useless Top 10 Lists for ranking in Google? Looking for effective and insightful info? SEO Black Hat Blog offers articles on Blackhat SEO, Linkbait &#038; Link Spamming. And if you need to escape White Hat SEO Whiners, check out he Private Black Hat Search Engine Optimization Forum.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:26:23 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: vifra</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/05/10/tutorial-make-more-money-on-your-sites-with-this-mouse-trap/comment-page-1/#comment-6835</link>
		<dc:creator>vifra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 16:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/?p=282#comment-6835</guid>
		<description>Hi I got this to work with IE but not firefox. But still awsome Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi I got this to work with IE but not firefox. But still awsome Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paolo</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/05/10/tutorial-make-more-money-on-your-sites-with-this-mouse-trap/comment-page-1/#comment-3907</link>
		<dc:creator>paolo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 11:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/?p=282#comment-3907</guid>
		<description>I did it filling search box with the same keyword used to build optimized page, u don&#039;t have to change google code and user only needs to clik on &quot;search&quot; button

it works great</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did it filling search box with the same keyword used to build optimized page, u don&#8217;t have to change google code and user only needs to clik on &#8220;search&#8221; button</p>
<p>it works great</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Self Evident</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/05/10/tutorial-make-more-money-on-your-sites-with-this-mouse-trap/comment-page-1/#comment-2575</link>
		<dc:creator>Self Evident</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 May 2006 10:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/?p=282#comment-2575</guid>
		<description>I call this stealing focus.  Its time for the mozilla people to add more checkboxes to advanced JavaScript settings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I call this stealing focus.  Its time for the mozilla people to add more checkboxes to advanced JavaScript settings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: creampiefan1</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/05/10/tutorial-make-more-money-on-your-sites-with-this-mouse-trap/comment-page-1/#comment-2158</link>
		<dc:creator>creampiefan1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 05:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/?p=282#comment-2158</guid>
		<description>Here is an idea I have thought about but never tried.
What about having the search box results automatically and directly appear on the page?

That way all SERPS on your page result in you getting paid. Heck, you might consider leaving the Adsense off completely if the search box serps make you more money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is an idea I have thought about but never tried.<br />
What about having the search box results automatically and directly appear on the page?</p>
<p>That way all SERPS on your page result in you getting paid. Heck, you might consider leaving the Adsense off completely if the search box serps make you more money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bhwannabe</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/05/10/tutorial-make-more-money-on-your-sites-with-this-mouse-trap/comment-page-1/#comment-2156</link>
		<dc:creator>bhwannabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 03:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/?p=282#comment-2156</guid>
		<description>Devilfish,

Are you saying that if an adwords advertiser opts out of advertising on the content network his ads will still show for searches done from an adsense search box? Isn&#039;t that still considered part of the content network? 

Ever since Adwords seperated the ability to bid on the content and search network, adsense payouts for content have gone way down. Maybe this is a way to avoid that problem?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Devilfish,</p>
<p>Are you saying that if an adwords advertiser opts out of advertising on the content network his ads will still show for searches done from an adsense search box? Isn&#8217;t that still considered part of the content network? </p>
<p>Ever since Adwords seperated the ability to bid on the content and search network, adsense payouts for content have gone way down. Maybe this is a way to avoid that problem?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: esoomllub</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/05/10/tutorial-make-more-money-on-your-sites-with-this-mouse-trap/comment-page-1/#comment-2153</link>
		<dc:creator>esoomllub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 18:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/?p=282#comment-2153</guid>
		<description>This can be handled without modifying the Google code at all, and presumably not violating TOS.  Just create a little JS function that selects all of the elements by name (&quot;q&quot; in this case). If you know you that you don&#039;t have other elements on the page with a name of &quot;q&quot;, just set the focus on the element that is returned.  If you have multiple, just handle the loop appropriately based on your page structure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This can be handled without modifying the Google code at all, and presumably not violating TOS.  Just create a little JS function that selects all of the elements by name (&#8221;q&#8221; in this case). If you know you that you don&#8217;t have other elements on the page with a name of &#8220;q&#8221;, just set the focus on the element that is returned.  If you have multiple, just handle the loop appropriately based on your page structure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davilac.net &#187; Resumen</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/05/10/tutorial-make-more-money-on-your-sites-with-this-mouse-trap/comment-page-1/#comment-2152</link>
		<dc:creator>Davilac.net &#187; Resumen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 06:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/?p=282#comment-2152</guid>
		<description>[...] Tutorial: Make More Money on Your Sites with a Mouse Trap [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tutorial: Make More Money on Your Sites with a Mouse Trap [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: devilfish</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/05/10/tutorial-make-more-money-on-your-sites-with-this-mouse-trap/comment-page-1/#comment-2146</link>
		<dc:creator>devilfish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 18:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/?p=282#comment-2146</guid>
		<description>&quot;I’m on to the real genius of this, sneaky pants. but I won’t spoil it for you&quot;

Depends if your talking about within the TOS are as a slam dunk action, grab the $$ and run

I have been a long believer in the S&#039;box as the PPC between content and search within a&#039;sense is very different between the 2.The PPC for an S&#039;box click in my experience tends to be 30% higher as so nany advertisers due to click fraud are staying away from the content network

With sites 140  pages per site + relevant unqiue content (not scraped, article bot(ish)crappy TE sites etc.....)  I still get a good % of house ads with a&#039;sense, as so many advertisers are wary of getting shitty results after paying $10 + for an insurance click because the winged monkeys at there agency are so stupid and waste 30% of there results buying such wide reaching results


The biggest crime is how PPC agencies buy for there clients, I am going away for a week and I am looking for a hotel by an airport as a pickup location. So I look for &quot;Malaga airport Hotels&quot;
Skip the affiliates as most of the results are from PPC companies buying broad searches &quot;Hotels&quot; &quot;airports&quot; etc..

I know its not new news but am in a bad mood and I am sick of people saying my style of traffic is B&#039;S

So if for example someone wants to search for &quot;best deal on widgets&quot; at least my traffic might get banned from the bigger engines but is targeted

Anyway I&#039;m in ranting mood so best if I go now  to the corner of my living room and scream a bit at myself, chanting &quot;die agencies die&quot;

On the upside will be on a beach tomorrow so maybe will find some harmony</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I’m on to the real genius of this, sneaky pants. but I won’t spoil it for you&#8221;</p>
<p>Depends if your talking about within the TOS are as a slam dunk action, grab the $$ and run</p>
<p>I have been a long believer in the S&#8217;box as the PPC between content and search within a&#8217;sense is very different between the 2.The PPC for an S&#8217;box click in my experience tends to be 30% higher as so nany advertisers due to click fraud are staying away from the content network</p>
<p>With sites 140  pages per site + relevant unqiue content (not scraped, article bot(ish)crappy TE sites etc&#8230;..)  I still get a good % of house ads with a&#8217;sense, as so many advertisers are wary of getting shitty results after paying $10 + for an insurance click because the winged monkeys at there agency are so stupid and waste 30% of there results buying such wide reaching results</p>
<p>The biggest crime is how PPC agencies buy for there clients, I am going away for a week and I am looking for a hotel by an airport as a pickup location. So I look for &#8220;Malaga airport Hotels&#8221;<br />
Skip the affiliates as most of the results are from PPC companies buying broad searches &#8220;Hotels&#8221; &#8220;airports&#8221; etc..</p>
<p>I know its not new news but am in a bad mood and I am sick of people saying my style of traffic is B&#8217;S</p>
<p>So if for example someone wants to search for &#8220;best deal on widgets&#8221; at least my traffic might get banned from the bigger engines but is targeted</p>
<p>Anyway I&#8217;m in ranting mood so best if I go now  to the corner of my living room and scream a bit at myself, chanting &#8220;die agencies die&#8221;</p>
<p>On the upside will be on a beach tomorrow so maybe will find some harmony</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PUA Forum</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/05/10/tutorial-make-more-money-on-your-sites-with-this-mouse-trap/comment-page-1/#comment-2145</link>
		<dc:creator>PUA Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 15:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/?p=282#comment-2145</guid>
		<description>Additionally, why not place a popular – and related - search term in the box ready for the site visitors to click? And why not vary the search term every day or so and monitor and compile a list of the most popular, then a simple server-side script could alternate the most popular on a daily or by-daily basis?

I’ve got a feeling this technique may be very effective on forums, because it seems natural to search for information on them. Gonna try it in the next few daysâ€¦. 

Just a quick thought: instead of displaying Adcents, why not produce your own site-search results (one way is with ZoomSearch) and include your own affiliate links at the top (potentially more profitable than Adsense).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Additionally, why not place a popular – and related &#8211; search term in the box ready for the site visitors to click? And why not vary the search term every day or so and monitor and compile a list of the most popular, then a simple server-side script could alternate the most popular on a daily or by-daily basis?</p>
<p>I’ve got a feeling this technique may be very effective on forums, because it seems natural to search for information on them. Gonna try it in the next few daysâ€¦. </p>
<p>Just a quick thought: instead of displaying Adcents, why not produce your own site-search results (one way is with ZoomSearch) and include your own affiliate links at the top (potentially more profitable than Adsense).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IrishWonder</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/05/10/tutorial-make-more-money-on-your-sites-with-this-mouse-trap/comment-page-1/#comment-2144</link>
		<dc:creator>IrishWonder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 13:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/?p=282#comment-2144</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t this kind of a modification against the AdSense TOS? - How about leaving the code intact?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t this kind of a modification against the AdSense TOS? &#8211; How about leaving the code intact?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
