<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Has Google Co-Op Has Improved their SERPs?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seoblackhat.com/2006/05/26/has-google-co-op-has-improved-their-serps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/05/26/has-google-co-op-has-improved-their-serps/</link>
	<description>Tired of useless Top 10 Lists for ranking in Google? Looking for effective and insightful info? SEO Black Hat Blog offers articles on Blackhat SEO, Linkbait &#38; Link Spamming. And if you need to escape White Hat SEO Whiners, check out he Private Black Hat Search Engine Optimization Forum.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 05:07:23 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: prouarch</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/05/26/has-google-co-op-has-improved-their-serps/comment-page-1/#comment-2704</link>
		<dc:creator>prouarch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 08:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/?p=305#comment-2704</guid>
		<description>Hi, 

I&#039;m the author of the &quot;RSS to Co-op&quot; online application, now you can  download it at
http://www.seo-search.net/rsstocoopdev/

Regards,

Pierre</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, </p>
<p>I&#8217;m the author of the &#8220;RSS to Co-op&#8221; online application, now you can  download it at<br />
<a href="http://www.seo-search.net/rsstocoopdev/" rel="nofollow">http://www.seo-search.net/rsstocoopdev/</a></p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Pierre</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Halfdeck</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/05/26/has-google-co-op-has-improved-their-serps/comment-page-1/#comment-2655</link>
		<dc:creator>Halfdeck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 May 2006 14:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/?p=305#comment-2655</guid>
		<description>I wrote a slightly different php script you can try.

Go to http://www.google.com/coop/manage/subscribedlinks,
and submit a link like this:

http://www.seo4fun.com/php/rss-parser.php?url=YOURRSSFEEDURL

e.g. 
http://www.seo4fun.com/php/rss-parser.php?url=http://www.blog.com/blog/feed/

Note: Your feed has to be RSS 2.0; I only had time to write one regexp. Also, I won&#039;t guarantee I won&#039;t move the script; if I do and if someone likes the script I&#039;ll post the source somewhere. The parser isn&#039;t perfect, so it may choke on a post or two. You can check the XML by loading up your url in your browser.

You don&#039;t need to download or upload anything. And it refreshes itself, so if you publish a new post, it will show up after a few hours in the Onebox when Google repings your feed.  Last thing, your post will show up for categoires you published your post under.

If I could just figure out how to pull archived feeds and create database objects for categories, a script like this could cover alot of queries if you have a big blog. For small blogs its still fun but not productive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote a slightly different php script you can try.</p>
<p>Go to <a href="http://www.google.com/coop/manage/subscribedlinks" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/coop/manage/subscribedlinks</a>,<br />
and submit a link like this:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.seo4fun.com/php/rss-parser.php?url=YOURRSSFEEDURL" rel="nofollow">http://www.seo4fun.com/php/rss-parser.php?url=YOURRSSFEEDURL</a></p>
<p>e.g.<br />
<a href="http://www.seo4fun.com/php/rss-parser.php?url=http://www.blog.com/blog/feed/" rel="nofollow">http://www.seo4fun.com/php/rss-parser.php?url=http://www.blog.com/blog/feed/</a></p>
<p>Note: Your feed has to be RSS 2.0; I only had time to write one regexp. Also, I won&#8217;t guarantee I won&#8217;t move the script; if I do and if someone likes the script I&#8217;ll post the source somewhere. The parser isn&#8217;t perfect, so it may choke on a post or two. You can check the XML by loading up your url in your browser.</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t need to download or upload anything. And it refreshes itself, so if you publish a new post, it will show up after a few hours in the Onebox when Google repings your feed.  Last thing, your post will show up for categoires you published your post under.</p>
<p>If I could just figure out how to pull archived feeds and create database objects for categories, a script like this could cover alot of queries if you have a big blog. For small blogs its still fun but not productive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rollinj</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/05/26/has-google-co-op-has-improved-their-serps/comment-page-1/#comment-2649</link>
		<dc:creator>rollinj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 23:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/?p=305#comment-2649</guid>
		<description>As for hand coding their results... I&#039;ve noticed a few odd occurence lately... mainly websites receiving TOP spot in google for under-the-radar-but-well-paying keywords with ABSOLUTELY NO LINKS.

Not only was the page obviously spam (just a doorway loaded with keywords) but it showed 0 links on msn for the TLD and the individual page...

How on earth could this be possible? No PR, not an old page (it was a new free porn hosting company from the TLD) and absolutely no links and it&#039;s still getting TOP spot in Google for it? Whatever the guy did is a genius, he was holding about 6 of the 10 places for &quot;home owner insurance quotes&quot; of every state for about a week there...

Any idea how this could be possible UNLESS he was working at Google? Get back to me by email if possible or leave a comment here, I&#039;m really curious about this... I can remember the TLD if you&#039;re interested...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for hand coding their results&#8230; I&#8217;ve noticed a few odd occurence lately&#8230; mainly websites receiving TOP spot in google for under-the-radar-but-well-paying keywords with ABSOLUTELY NO LINKS.</p>
<p>Not only was the page obviously spam (just a doorway loaded with keywords) but it showed 0 links on msn for the TLD and the individual page&#8230;</p>
<p>How on earth could this be possible? No PR, not an old page (it was a new free porn hosting company from the TLD) and absolutely no links and it&#8217;s still getting TOP spot in Google for it? Whatever the guy did is a genius, he was holding about 6 of the 10 places for &#8220;home owner insurance quotes&#8221; of every state for about a week there&#8230;</p>
<p>Any idea how this could be possible UNLESS he was working at Google? Get back to me by email if possible or leave a comment here, I&#8217;m really curious about this&#8230; I can remember the TLD if you&#8217;re interested&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anty</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/05/26/has-google-co-op-has-improved-their-serps/comment-page-1/#comment-2636</link>
		<dc:creator>anty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 17:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/?p=305#comment-2636</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve nerver heard of Google Co-Op. As far as I have understand this, the user has to manually add you to his personalized search. Or am I getting something wrong here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve nerver heard of Google Co-Op. As far as I have understand this, the user has to manually add you to his personalized search. Or am I getting something wrong here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: datad</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/05/26/has-google-co-op-has-improved-their-serps/comment-page-1/#comment-2635</link>
		<dc:creator>datad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 16:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/?p=305#comment-2635</guid>
		<description>Yes, it certainly is cleaned up a bit...  but try placing some adjectives in front of your pill of choice.

i.e., search on &quot;cheap cialis&quot; or even &quot;cheap viagra&quot; for that matter...looks as familiar as ever!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it certainly is cleaned up a bit&#8230;  but try placing some adjectives in front of your pill of choice.</p>
<p>i.e., search on &#8220;cheap cialis&#8221; or even &#8220;cheap viagra&#8221; for that matter&#8230;looks as familiar as ever!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

