<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google: &#8220;Keyword Density Matters More Than Links&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seoblackhat.com/2006/08/03/google-keyword-density-matters-more-than-links/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/08/03/google-keyword-density-matters-more-than-links/</link>
	<description>Tired of useless Top 10 Lists for ranking in Google? Looking for effective and insightful info? SEO Black Hat Blog offers articles on Blackhat SEO, Linkbait &#38; Link Spamming. And if you need to escape White Hat SEO Whiners, check out he Private Black Hat Search Engine Optimization Forum.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 05:07:23 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: How to Avoid Using Poisonous Meta Tags SEO Black Hat: SEO Blog</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/08/03/google-keyword-density-matters-more-than-links/comment-page-1/#comment-3577</link>
		<dc:creator>How to Avoid Using Poisonous Meta Tags SEO Black Hat: SEO Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 09:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/?p=372#comment-3577</guid>
		<description>[...] While we have shown that supplemental results can outrank non supplemental results in Google, wouldn’t you rather not have large portions of your site go supplemental in the first place? In fact, our analysis show that you would be better off removing the description tag entirely than having it the same on multiple pages. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] While we have shown that supplemental results can outrank non supplemental results in Google, wouldn’t you rather not have large portions of your site go supplemental in the first place? In fact, our analysis show that you would be better off removing the description tag entirely than having it the same on multiple pages. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CPayscom2OnlineCasino</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/08/03/google-keyword-density-matters-more-than-links/comment-page-1/#comment-3540</link>
		<dc:creator>CPayscom2OnlineCasino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 09:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/?p=372#comment-3540</guid>
		<description>QuadsZilla, I think backlinks are still pretty high weight for Google. I have been seo-ing with keyword density for certain keywords recently but just can&#039;t beat the first ranker in Google. I also observed that Google would rank you well if you frequently update ur content and keep the keyword density in check.

btw, you mention something about your web page size. Does that matter in SEO for Google? I did heard stuffs like Google index size, etc. but I have no idea what they are. Oooohh QuadsZilla, the Goddess of SEO, could you enlighten me on this! :p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>QuadsZilla, I think backlinks are still pretty high weight for Google. I have been seo-ing with keyword density for certain keywords recently but just can&#8217;t beat the first ranker in Google. I also observed that Google would rank you well if you frequently update ur content and keep the keyword density in check.</p>
<p>btw, you mention something about your web page size. Does that matter in SEO for Google? I did heard stuffs like Google index size, etc. but I have no idea what they are. Oooohh QuadsZilla, the Goddess of SEO, could you enlighten me on this! :p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yolkie</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/08/03/google-keyword-density-matters-more-than-links/comment-page-1/#comment-3536</link>
		<dc:creator>yolkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 09:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/?p=372#comment-3536</guid>
		<description>QuadsZilla, I think Google still put pretty much weight on the links volume and the changes frequency. A static page probably can rank well with keyword density &amp; links. But, the main domain would rank well if you updare frequently with keyword density in check.

by the way, i see that you mention about yout webpage size. is that critical for the seo? i did heard something like Google index size, etc. but have no idea what are those index size for. could you enlighten me, oh QuadsZilla, the Goddess of SEO! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>QuadsZilla, I think Google still put pretty much weight on the links volume and the changes frequency. A static page probably can rank well with keyword density &amp; links. But, the main domain would rank well if you updare frequently with keyword density in check.</p>
<p>by the way, i see that you mention about yout webpage size. is that critical for the seo? i did heard something like Google index size, etc. but have no idea what are those index size for. could you enlighten me, oh QuadsZilla, the Goddess of SEO! <img src='http://seoblackhat.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO for Everyone &#187; SEOcritique.com&#8217;s SEO-SEM Blogroll 08-03-06</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/08/03/google-keyword-density-matters-more-than-links/comment-page-1/#comment-3489</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO for Everyone &#187; SEOcritique.com&#8217;s SEO-SEM Blogroll 08-03-06</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 05:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/?p=372#comment-3489</guid>
		<description>[...] QuadsZilla explores why in some cases on Google: “Keyword Density Matters More Than Links” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] QuadsZilla explores why in some cases on Google: “Keyword Density Matters More Than Links” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

