<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tool: What it’s Worth to Rank in Google, Yahoo and MSN</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seoblackhat.com/2006/08/11/tool-clicks-by-rank-in-google-yahoo-msn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/08/11/tool-clicks-by-rank-in-google-yahoo-msn/</link>
	<description>Tired of useless Top 10 Lists for ranking in Google? Looking for effective and insightful info? SEO Black Hat Blog offers articles on Blackhat SEO, Linkbait &#038; Link Spamming. And if you need to escape White Hat SEO Whiners, check out he Private Black Hat Search Engine Optimization Forum.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 11:30:00 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Since When Does Top 89th Percentile Mean Douchebag? (Since Always!)</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/08/11/tool-clicks-by-rank-in-google-yahoo-msn/comment-page-1/#comment-9327</link>
		<dc:creator>Since When Does Top 89th Percentile Mean Douchebag? (Since Always!)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 03:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/?p=377#comment-9327</guid>
		<description>[...] When you think about it, though, search engines rank pretty much the same way. The top 10 positions in a given SERP will garner 88.7% of all clicks. Positions 11-1000 in the SERPs account for only 11.7% of clicks (breakdown). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] When you think about it, though, search engines rank pretty much the same way. The top 10 positions in a given SERP will garner 88.7% of all clicks. Positions 11-1000 in the SERPs account for only 11.7% of clicks (breakdown). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Value of SEO and B2B &#171; huh?</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/08/11/tool-clicks-by-rank-in-google-yahoo-msn/comment-page-1/#comment-9282</link>
		<dc:creator>The Value of SEO and B2B &#171; huh?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 03:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/?p=377#comment-9282</guid>
		<description>[...] This is great stuff, aggregated data using a couple of sources from SEOBlackHat. The data is 2 years old, but if anything the numbers have skewed more to the top as searchers have gotten more savvy, using more defined searches thus returning more relevant results: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is great stuff, aggregated data using a couple of sources from SEOBlackHat. The data is 2 years old, but if anything the numbers have skewed more to the top as searchers have gotten more savvy, using more defined searches thus returning more relevant results: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: klaus</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/08/11/tool-clicks-by-rank-in-google-yahoo-msn/comment-page-1/#comment-7684</link>
		<dc:creator>klaus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 01:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/?p=377#comment-7684</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the tool. However, and I am sorry to bring the bad news but OVT is dead. There&#039;s no such thing as &quot;the number of overture searches the term had last month&quot;. &quot;Last month&quot; is May/2007, I think. 

Also you are giving away the full source code...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the tool. However, and I am sorry to bring the bad news but OVT is dead. There&#8217;s no such thing as &#8220;the number of overture searches the term had last month&#8221;. &#8220;Last month&#8221; is May/2007, I think. </p>
<p>Also you are giving away the full source code&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blind spot on the first page : navigatron</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/08/11/tool-clicks-by-rank-in-google-yahoo-msn/comment-page-1/#comment-7565</link>
		<dc:creator>Blind spot on the first page : navigatron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 00:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/?p=377#comment-7565</guid>
		<description>[...] SEOBlackhat&#8217;s QuadsZilla has posted some time ago about what was worth to rank in Google, Yahoo and MSN. His calculations indicated that each step towards the wholy grail you make, the higher the rank the click through you would experience, except for moving from 10th to 9th when you actually see a little drom in click throughs. Here&#8217;s QuadsZilla&#8217;s table.  Ranking Number 1 receives 42.1 percent of click throughs. Ranking Number 2 receives 11.9 percent of click throughs. Ranking Number 3 receives 8.5 percent of click throughs. Ranking Number 4 receives 6.1 percent of click throughs. Ranking Number 5 receives 4.9 percent of click throughs. Ranking Number 6 receives 4.1 percent of click throughs. Ranking Number 7 receives 3.4 percent of click throughs. Ranking Number 8 receives 3.0 percent of click throughs. Ranking Number 9 receives 2.8 percent of click throughs. Ranking Number 10 receives 3.0 percent of click throughs. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SEOBlackhat&#8217;s QuadsZilla has posted some time ago about what was worth to rank in Google, Yahoo and MSN. His calculations indicated that each step towards the wholy grail you make, the higher the rank the click through you would experience, except for moving from 10th to 9th when you actually see a little drom in click throughs. Here&#8217;s QuadsZilla&#8217;s table.  Ranking Number 1 receives 42.1 percent of click throughs. Ranking Number 2 receives 11.9 percent of click throughs. Ranking Number 3 receives 8.5 percent of click throughs. Ranking Number 4 receives 6.1 percent of click throughs. Ranking Number 5 receives 4.9 percent of click throughs. Ranking Number 6 receives 4.1 percent of click throughs. Ranking Number 7 receives 3.4 percent of click throughs. Ranking Number 8 receives 3.0 percent of click throughs. Ranking Number 9 receives 2.8 percent of click throughs. Ranking Number 10 receives 3.0 percent of click throughs. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: perry</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/08/11/tool-clicks-by-rank-in-google-yahoo-msn/comment-page-1/#comment-6643</link>
		<dc:creator>perry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/?p=377#comment-6643</guid>
		<description>Ranking Number 1 receives 42.1 percent of click throughs.
Ranking Number 2 receives 11.9 percent of click throughs.
Ranking Number 3 receives 8.5 percent of click throughs.
Ranking Number 4 receives 6.1 percent of click throughs.
Ranking Number 5 receives 4.9 percent of click throughs.
Ranking Number 6 receives 4.1 percent of click throughs.
Ranking Number 7 receives 3.4 percent of click throughs.
Ranking Number 8 receives 3.0 percent of click throughs.
Ranking Number 9 receives 2.8 percent of click throughs.
Ranking Number 10 receives 3.0 percent of click throughs.


I&#039;m sorry, but that isn&#039;t even close to being believable, and not all is being told. 

I have clicked on several links throughout page one. Sometimes on page two. And so have you! I have asked a lot of people if they stopped after clicking on the first one. The answer, every single time was &quot;no.&quot; 

Look at all the porn sites out there. You think all those guys are going to stop at the first link and not click on the others? Nope. How &#039;bout all those &quot;funny news&quot; and &quot;funny pcitures&quot; sites? Nope. What about singles looking for dating and sex advice? Not even close. 

And how &#039;bout during the holidays, and fathers and mothers day? You think many of those shoppers are going to click on JUST one link? 

Sorry, but those figures aren&#039;t right. Not even close. 

So there is much more to that &quot;research&quot; than meets the eye.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ranking Number 1 receives 42.1 percent of click throughs.<br />
Ranking Number 2 receives 11.9 percent of click throughs.<br />
Ranking Number 3 receives 8.5 percent of click throughs.<br />
Ranking Number 4 receives 6.1 percent of click throughs.<br />
Ranking Number 5 receives 4.9 percent of click throughs.<br />
Ranking Number 6 receives 4.1 percent of click throughs.<br />
Ranking Number 7 receives 3.4 percent of click throughs.<br />
Ranking Number 8 receives 3.0 percent of click throughs.<br />
Ranking Number 9 receives 2.8 percent of click throughs.<br />
Ranking Number 10 receives 3.0 percent of click throughs.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry, but that isn&#8217;t even close to being believable, and not all is being told. </p>
<p>I have clicked on several links throughout page one. Sometimes on page two. And so have you! I have asked a lot of people if they stopped after clicking on the first one. The answer, every single time was &#8220;no.&#8221; </p>
<p>Look at all the porn sites out there. You think all those guys are going to stop at the first link and not click on the others? Nope. How &#8217;bout all those &#8220;funny news&#8221; and &#8220;funny pcitures&#8221; sites? Nope. What about singles looking for dating and sex advice? Not even close. </p>
<p>And how &#8217;bout during the holidays, and fathers and mothers day? You think many of those shoppers are going to click on JUST one link? </p>
<p>Sorry, but those figures aren&#8217;t right. Not even close. </p>
<p>So there is much more to that &#8220;research&#8221; than meets the eye.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search Engine Optimisation Hints and Tips - What&#8217;s a #1 rank on Google worth, in terms of clicks?</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/08/11/tool-clicks-by-rank-in-google-yahoo-msn/comment-page-1/#comment-5002</link>
		<dc:creator>Search Engine Optimisation Hints and Tips - What&#8217;s a #1 rank on Google worth, in terms of clicks?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 13:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/?p=377#comment-5002</guid>
		<description>[...] Found this article whilst on my daily surf. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Found this article whilst on my daily surf. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skillfull</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/08/11/tool-clicks-by-rank-in-google-yahoo-msn/comment-page-1/#comment-4341</link>
		<dc:creator>skillfull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 06:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/?p=377#comment-4341</guid>
		<description>yeah its too high by a loooooooong mile ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah its too high by a loooooooong mile <img src='http://seoblackhat.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bio - Tech - Business &#187; Dis moi tes recherches, je te dirai qui tu es !</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/08/11/tool-clicks-by-rank-in-google-yahoo-msn/comment-page-1/#comment-4044</link>
		<dc:creator>Bio - Tech - Business &#187; Dis moi tes recherches, je te dirai qui tu es !</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/?p=377#comment-4044</guid>
		<description>[...] 45 % des clics se font sur le premier rÃ©sultat de recherche, le second ne totalisant dÃ©jÃ  plus que 13 % des clics et ainsi de suite ; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 45 % des clics se font sur le premier rÃ©sultat de recherche, le second ne totalisant dÃ©jÃ  plus que 13 % des clics et ainsi de suite ; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Le Blogueur &#187; A qui appartiennent mes logs ?</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/08/11/tool-clicks-by-rank-in-google-yahoo-msn/comment-page-1/#comment-3835</link>
		<dc:creator>Le Blogueur &#187; A qui appartiennent mes logs ?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 13:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/?p=377#comment-3835</guid>
		<description>[...] 45 % des clics se font sur le premier rÃ©sultat de recherche, le second ne totalisant dÃ©jÃ  plus que 13 % des clics et ainsi de suite ; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 45 % des clics se font sur le premier rÃ©sultat de recherche, le second ne totalisant dÃ©jÃ  plus que 13 % des clics et ainsi de suite ; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AOL search data &#124; DropShipArea.com</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/08/11/tool-clicks-by-rank-in-google-yahoo-msn/comment-page-1/#comment-3719</link>
		<dc:creator>AOL search data &#124; DropShipArea.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 06:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/?p=377#comment-3719</guid>
		<description>[...] Recently there was much online hype with AOL making public its search data for the period of three months. AOL tried to correct this mistake by withdrawing the data asap, but search marketers were fast to grasp the value of the information and make it available online – you can download the AOL search data here. In fact I have seen free and useful online tools based on this data. See a sample here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Recently there was much online hype with AOL making public its search data for the period of three months. AOL tried to correct this mistake by withdrawing the data asap, but search marketers were fast to grasp the value of the information and make it available online – you can download the AOL search data here. In fact I have seen free and useful online tools based on this data. See a sample here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
