<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Site Intra-Linking Wordpress SEO Experiment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seoblackhat.com/2006/09/03/on-site-intra-linking-wordpress-seo-experiment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/09/03/on-site-intra-linking-wordpress-seo-experiment/</link>
	<description>Tired of useless Top 10 Lists for ranking in Google? Looking for effective and insightful info? SEO Black Hat Blog offers articles on Blackhat SEO, Linkbait &#038; Link Spamming. And if you need to escape White Hat SEO Whiners, check out he Private Black Hat Search Engine Optimization Forum.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:35:48 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Click Distance Matters.</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/09/03/on-site-intra-linking-wordpress-seo-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-4100</link>
		<dc:creator>Click Distance Matters.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 09:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2006/09/03/on-site-intra-linking-wordpress-seo-experiment/#comment-4100</guid>
		<description>[...] As an SEO experiment, a little less than a month ago we 1. Removed all the categories from the sidebar 2. Listed titles of every post with links every page 3. We got rid of the Google Sitemap. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As an SEO experiment, a little less than a month ago we 1. Removed all the categories from the sidebar 2. Listed titles of every post with links every page 3. We got rid of the Google Sitemap. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paolo</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/09/03/on-site-intra-linking-wordpress-seo-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-3848</link>
		<dc:creator>paolo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 14:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2006/09/03/on-site-intra-linking-wordpress-seo-experiment/#comment-3848</guid>
		<description>helle, new here

I&#039;d like to get this piece of code, it seems great</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>helle, new here</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to get this piece of code, it seems great</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QuadsZilla</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/09/03/on-site-intra-linking-wordpress-seo-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-3827</link>
		<dc:creator>QuadsZilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 18:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2006/09/03/on-site-intra-linking-wordpress-seo-experiment/#comment-3827</guid>
		<description>&quot;Those are link count numbers?&quot;

No, those numbers are monthly search engine referrals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Those are link count numbers?&#8221;</p>
<p>No, those numbers are monthly search engine referrals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ArchStanton</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/09/03/on-site-intra-linking-wordpress-seo-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-3826</link>
		<dc:creator>ArchStanton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 18:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2006/09/03/on-site-intra-linking-wordpress-seo-experiment/#comment-3826</guid>
		<description>I think it would be much more usable to have the links sorted by category, with headings, however this wouldn&#039;t work so well with articles in more than one category.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it would be much more usable to have the links sorted by category, with headings, however this wouldn&#8217;t work so well with articles in more than one category.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rxbbx</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/09/03/on-site-intra-linking-wordpress-seo-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-3811</link>
		<dc:creator>rxbbx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 18:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2006/09/03/on-site-intra-linking-wordpress-seo-experiment/#comment-3811</guid>
		<description>You could use both.. categories and the way you do with those posts.. i have not the balls to display every post on a blog like you do.. but if it faills.. why not try both.. i think you need your categories..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could use both.. categories and the way you do with those posts.. i have not the balls to display every post on a blog like you do.. but if it faills.. why not try both.. i think you need your categories..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QuadsZilla</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/09/03/on-site-intra-linking-wordpress-seo-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-3810</link>
		<dc:creator>QuadsZilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 15:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2006/09/03/on-site-intra-linking-wordpress-seo-experiment/#comment-3810</guid>
		<description>Muskie,

Yea I had done some category foo. I don&#039;t really expect this layout to the optimal way to go.  It&#039;s more an experiment in intra linking.  My site map had been more than 800 page - but my category pages would rarely get any natural links.  Yahoo says I have Pages (1,737)  &#124; Inlinks (3,929) from external sites.

But I would bet that those 5404 links are spread over about 300 pages.  By intralinking those 300 or so pages, it may produce some interesting results.  Plus, I was finding it a pain to find old posts and the google site search was producing shit results.  This setup will make it easy for people to read every post and may result in some backlinks to old posts and hopefully improve the relevancy of search queries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Muskie,</p>
<p>Yea I had done some category foo. I don&#8217;t really expect this layout to the optimal way to go.  It&#8217;s more an experiment in intra linking.  My site map had been more than 800 page &#8211; but my category pages would rarely get any natural links.  Yahoo says I have Pages (1,737)  | Inlinks (3,929) from external sites.</p>
<p>But I would bet that those 5404 links are spread over about 300 pages.  By intralinking those 300 or so pages, it may produce some interesting results.  Plus, I was finding it a pain to find old posts and the google site search was producing shit results.  This setup will make it easy for people to read every post and may result in some backlinks to old posts and hopefully improve the relevancy of search queries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joecoolmedia</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/09/03/on-site-intra-linking-wordpress-seo-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-3807</link>
		<dc:creator>joecoolmedia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Sep 2006 22:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2006/09/03/on-site-intra-linking-wordpress-seo-experiment/#comment-3807</guid>
		<description>I only wish you would&#039;ve done it earlier, it was a tremendous pain in the ass reading everypost in here going backwords from the homepage, well worth it though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I only wish you would&#8217;ve done it earlier, it was a tremendous pain in the ass reading everypost in here going backwords from the homepage, well worth it though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Muskie</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/09/03/on-site-intra-linking-wordpress-seo-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-3806</link>
		<dc:creator>Muskie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Sep 2006 18:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2006/09/03/on-site-intra-linking-wordpress-seo-experiment/#comment-3806</guid>
		<description>Those are link count numbers?

Does this alteration remove your category landing pages?  I mean if you have a
category &quot;foo&quot; you have a top &quot;foo&quot; page with your most recent 5 to 10 posts
tagged with &quot;foo&quot;.  Sometimes I get search referrals to these category pages
rather than a specific posting because presumeably WordPress and Google&#039;s
algorithm jells with keyword frequency or some unexpect amalgamation of words
creating phrases I never even used.

Anyway losing these category pages or at least easy access to them for search
engine spiders would be an unfortunate side effect of this experiment.

I got rid of the monthly links, but I have the calendar plugin if people really
want to navigate by date rather than category which makes more sense.  Who cares
what you wrote on November 12th 2005.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those are link count numbers?</p>
<p>Does this alteration remove your category landing pages?  I mean if you have a<br />
category &#8220;foo&#8221; you have a top &#8220;foo&#8221; page with your most recent 5 to 10 posts<br />
tagged with &#8220;foo&#8221;.  Sometimes I get search referrals to these category pages<br />
rather than a specific posting because presumeably WordPress and Google&#8217;s<br />
algorithm jells with keyword frequency or some unexpect amalgamation of words<br />
creating phrases I never even used.</p>
<p>Anyway losing these category pages or at least easy access to them for search<br />
engine spiders would be an unfortunate side effect of this experiment.</p>
<p>I got rid of the monthly links, but I have the calendar plugin if people really<br />
want to navigate by date rather than category which makes more sense.  Who cares<br />
what you wrote on November 12th 2005.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: graywolf</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/09/03/on-site-intra-linking-wordpress-seo-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-3798</link>
		<dc:creator>graywolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Sep 2006 14:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2006/09/03/on-site-intra-linking-wordpress-seo-experiment/#comment-3798</guid>
		<description>You seem to go supplemental after 180 or so pages, that would be a good number to watch as well

http://www.google.com/search?q=site:seoblackhat.com&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;start=180&amp;sa=N</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You seem to go supplemental after 180 or so pages, that would be a good number to watch as well</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=site:seoblackhat.com&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;start=180&amp;sa=N" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/search?q=site:seoblackhat.com&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;start=180&amp;sa=N</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rxbbx</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/09/03/on-site-intra-linking-wordpress-seo-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-3793</link>
		<dc:creator>rxbbx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Sep 2006 10:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2006/09/03/on-site-intra-linking-wordpress-seo-experiment/#comment-3793</guid>
		<description>Interesting.. hopefully an update with stats in 30 days..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.. hopefully an update with stats in 30 days..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
