<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Prettier Sites Will Rank Higher in the SERPs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seoblackhat.com/2006/09/21/why-prettier-sites-will-rank-higher-in-the-serps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/09/21/why-prettier-sites-will-rank-higher-in-the-serps/</link>
	<description>Tired of useless Top 10 Lists for ranking in Google? Looking for effective and insightful info? SEO Black Hat Blog offers articles on Blackhat SEO, Linkbait &#38; Link Spamming. And if you need to escape White Hat SEO Whiners, check out he Private Black Hat Search Engine Optimization Forum.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 05:07:23 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Click Distance Matters.</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/09/21/why-prettier-sites-will-rank-higher-in-the-serps/comment-page-1/#comment-4101</link>
		<dc:creator>Click Distance Matters.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 09:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2006/09/21/why-prettier-sites-will-rank-higher-in-the-serps/#comment-4101</guid>
		<description>[...] There was a 74% climb in the number of Google search referrals. MSN switched to live – and live hated my old layout because it was ugly (let’s see if that picks up any with the new design).. Yahoo was down slightly and Ask Jeeves up slightly. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There was a 74% climb in the number of Google search referrals. MSN switched to live – and live hated my old layout because it was ugly (let’s see if that picks up any with the new design).. Yahoo was down slightly and Ask Jeeves up slightly. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evulvmedia</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/09/21/why-prettier-sites-will-rank-higher-in-the-serps/comment-page-1/#comment-4033</link>
		<dc:creator>evulvmedia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 17:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2006/09/21/why-prettier-sites-will-rank-higher-in-the-serps/#comment-4033</guid>
		<description>Man, just think of one of those jobs- for the PORN category. 

What do you do, Ray?

&quot;Well, I look over 1,000 porn sites for Microsoft on a daily basis. I FIELD TEST them, test their... ummmm... USABILITY and... ummm... fitness for a PARTICULAR PURPOSE...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, just think of one of those jobs- for the PORN category. </p>
<p>What do you do, Ray?</p>
<p>&#8220;Well, I look over 1,000 porn sites for Microsoft on a daily basis. I FIELD TEST them, test their&#8230; ummmm&#8230; USABILITY and&#8230; ummm&#8230; fitness for a PARTICULAR PURPOSE&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spiffy360</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/09/21/why-prettier-sites-will-rank-higher-in-the-serps/comment-page-1/#comment-4024</link>
		<dc:creator>spiffy360</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 00:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2006/09/21/why-prettier-sites-will-rank-higher-in-the-serps/#comment-4024</guid>
		<description>Pretty sites ARE rankinging higher, way to go on this article. I&#039;m an old dog ex-Netscape marketing professional and I learned how to get great ranking in the late 90&#039;s. I would suggest that any White Hat SEO including Frederick Marckini of iProspect.com does the same thing I do when you accept a large $80,000 or more per year organic SEO - SEM job; You CROSS your fingers when you are done with the SEO of the client&#039;s site. I&#039;ve optimized more than 100 sites over the past three years, and the ones that rank on page one today of Google are pretty sites. now I know the ugly ones that are ranking on page two and page three HAVE the potential to rank on page one... I can see why they don&#039;t and NOW I am pretty sure I know how to fix them.  This is a GREAT blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty sites ARE rankinging higher, way to go on this article. I&#8217;m an old dog ex-Netscape marketing professional and I learned how to get great ranking in the late 90&#8217;s. I would suggest that any White Hat SEO including Frederick Marckini of iProspect.com does the same thing I do when you accept a large $80,000 or more per year organic SEO &#8211; SEM job; You CROSS your fingers when you are done with the SEO of the client&#8217;s site. I&#8217;ve optimized more than 100 sites over the past three years, and the ones that rank on page one today of Google are pretty sites. now I know the ugly ones that are ranking on page two and page three HAVE the potential to rank on page one&#8230; I can see why they don&#8217;t and NOW I am pretty sure I know how to fix them.  This is a GREAT blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rxbbx</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/09/21/why-prettier-sites-will-rank-higher-in-the-serps/comment-page-1/#comment-4012</link>
		<dc:creator>rxbbx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2006 15:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2006/09/21/why-prettier-sites-will-rank-higher-in-the-serps/#comment-4012</guid>
		<description>Those ajax things are great. Just little things. Site is ok.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those ajax things are great. Just little things. Site is ok.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/09/21/why-prettier-sites-will-rank-higher-in-the-serps/comment-page-1/#comment-4006</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 19:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2006/09/21/why-prettier-sites-will-rank-higher-in-the-serps/#comment-4006</guid>
		<description>While I see some problems if they were to use Alexa I don&#039;t necessarily agree with AfterMac&#039;s assertion that Alexa only ranks US sites. .com.au sites are certainly ranked on Alexa.

I wonder whether &#039;pretty&#039; sites are what people look for. A survey taken early this year found that people who shopped online during the Christmas season were more prepared to buy from sites that looked &#039;professional&#039; - many of them were quite prepared to shop at sites they had never visited before if it looked &#039;professional&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I see some problems if they were to use Alexa I don&#8217;t necessarily agree with AfterMac&#8217;s assertion that Alexa only ranks US sites. .com.au sites are certainly ranked on Alexa.</p>
<p>I wonder whether &#8216;pretty&#8217; sites are what people look for. A survey taken early this year found that people who shopped online during the Christmas season were more prepared to buy from sites that looked &#8216;professional&#8217; &#8211; many of them were quite prepared to shop at sites they had never visited before if it looked &#8216;professional&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joebanner</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/09/21/why-prettier-sites-will-rank-higher-in-the-serps/comment-page-1/#comment-3998</link>
		<dc:creator>joebanner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 16:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2006/09/21/why-prettier-sites-will-rank-higher-in-the-serps/#comment-3998</guid>
		<description>Should we expect a new design here soon? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should we expect a new design here soon? <img src='http://seoblackhat.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oatmeal</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/09/21/why-prettier-sites-will-rank-higher-in-the-serps/comment-page-1/#comment-3997</link>
		<dc:creator>oatmeal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2006/09/21/why-prettier-sites-will-rank-higher-in-the-serps/#comment-3997</guid>
		<description>In my experience, the majority of non-techie users barely ever notice the design of a site.  What they&#039;re mostly concerned with is the quality of the information they find, not the pretty packaging.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my experience, the majority of non-techie users barely ever notice the design of a site.  What they&#8217;re mostly concerned with is the quality of the information they find, not the pretty packaging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrbig25</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/09/21/why-prettier-sites-will-rank-higher-in-the-serps/comment-page-1/#comment-3996</link>
		<dc:creator>mrbig25</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2006/09/21/why-prettier-sites-will-rank-higher-in-the-serps/#comment-3996</guid>
		<description>Well, that&#039;s sort of what Cha Cha is doing, no?
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chacha.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ChaCha&lt;/a&gt; seems a little rough right now and has been dismissed by some, but &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.auinteractive.com/interview-with-scott-jones-creator-of-the-chacha-search-engine&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Scott Jones&lt;/a&gt; has been around the block a few times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, that&#8217;s sort of what Cha Cha is doing, no?<br />
<a href="http://www.chacha.com/" rel="nofollow">ChaCha</a> seems a little rough right now and has been dismissed by some, but <a href="http://blog.auinteractive.com/interview-with-scott-jones-creator-of-the-chacha-search-engine" rel="nofollow">Scott Jones</a> has been around the block a few times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlterMac</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/09/21/why-prettier-sites-will-rank-higher-in-the-serps/comment-page-1/#comment-3995</link>
		<dc:creator>AlterMac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2006/09/21/why-prettier-sites-will-rank-higher-in-the-serps/#comment-3995</guid>
		<description>There is one error: Only US-Sites rank with Alexa. The Alexa Toolbar is used seldom on the other side of the pond. If MS want&#039;s to break the near 90% of Google marketshare in Europe an Alexa-Rank doesn&#039;t fit. 

Maybe the army of human filters are the SE-Users themself: Simply Track the Back-Button and Rank the ones wich don&#039;t come back.

Good Bye for MFA and the ugly ones!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is one error: Only US-Sites rank with Alexa. The Alexa Toolbar is used seldom on the other side of the pond. If MS want&#8217;s to break the near 90% of Google marketshare in Europe an Alexa-Rank doesn&#8217;t fit. </p>
<p>Maybe the army of human filters are the SE-Users themself: Simply Track the Back-Button and Rank the ones wich don&#8217;t come back.</p>
<p>Good Bye for MFA and the ugly ones!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: itrends</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/09/21/why-prettier-sites-will-rank-higher-in-the-serps/comment-page-1/#comment-3994</link>
		<dc:creator>itrends</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 14:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2006/09/21/why-prettier-sites-will-rank-higher-in-the-serps/#comment-3994</guid>
		<description>Oh, and I am sure this can be abused. What if you become a guide and just direct your users to a page that generates your ref links from clickbank products etc....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and I am sure this can be abused. What if you become a guide and just direct your users to a page that generates your ref links from clickbank products etc&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

