<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Free Porn on a Porn Free Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seoblackhat.com/2006/11/21/free-porn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/11/21/free-porn/</link>
	<description>Tired of useless Top 10 Lists for ranking in Google? Looking for effective and insightful info? SEO Black Hat Blog offers articles on Blackhat SEO, Linkbait &#38; Link Spamming. And if you need to escape White Hat SEO Whiners, check out he Private Black Hat Search Engine Optimization Forum.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 05:07:23 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Welcome to Googlestan! Google Purges Adult Content from Search Results &#124; SugarBank</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/11/21/free-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-6709</link>
		<dc:creator>Welcome to Googlestan! Google Purges Adult Content from Search Results &#124; SugarBank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2006/11/21/free-porn/#comment-6709</guid>
		<description>[...] A few days ago the devil children over at SEOBlackHat.com notified me of a new kind of Google-dance. Normally the #1 search engine targets the latest exploits when it reorganizes its index, causing webmasters to sweat and wait to see if their pages will rise or fall in the new order. This time Google took a far larger step – removing explicit sexual content from listings en masse. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A few days ago the devil children over at SEOBlackHat.com notified me of a new kind of Google-dance. Normally the #1 search engine targets the latest exploits when it reorganizes its index, causing webmasters to sweat and wait to see if their pages will rise or fall in the new order. This time Google took a far larger step – removing explicit sexual content from listings en masse. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: herbie</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/11/21/free-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-6398</link>
		<dc:creator>herbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 12:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2006/11/21/free-porn/#comment-6398</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve run adult sites for years and despite the big hoohah regarding the changes in algo it hasnt really affected anyones traffic to a great extent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve run adult sites for years and despite the big hoohah regarding the changes in algo it hasnt really affected anyones traffic to a great extent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Error Forum Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Shift In Google Algo - Free Porn</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/11/21/free-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-5473</link>
		<dc:creator>Error Forum Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Shift In Google Algo - Free Porn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 07:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2006/11/21/free-porn/#comment-5473</guid>
		<description>[...] Have a read. Many sites dropped out of the top ten for obvious keyword terms. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Have a read. Many sites dropped out of the top ten for obvious keyword terms. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SPORTS NEWS &#187; Google Hates Indie-Porn?</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/11/21/free-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-5435</link>
		<dc:creator>SPORTS NEWS &#187; Google Hates Indie-Porn?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 15:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2006/11/21/free-porn/#comment-5435</guid>
		<description>[...] Some bounced around a theory that it was an attempt to clean up the search results, but Google&#8217;s never really had a problem with porn before, just guns and booze. Besides, if somebody were searching for some of the competitive terms listed at SEOBlackHat.com, relevancy should rule over prudishness. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Some bounced around a theory that it was an attempt to clean up the search results, but Google&#8217;s never really had a problem with porn before, just guns and booze. Besides, if somebody were searching for some of the competitive terms listed at SEOBlackHat.com, relevancy should rule over prudishness. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scotland SEO Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Is There Something To This &#8220;Place 31 Phenomenon?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/11/21/free-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-5430</link>
		<dc:creator>Scotland SEO Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Is There Something To This &#8220;Place 31 Phenomenon?&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 02:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2006/11/21/free-porn/#comment-5430</guid>
		<description>[...] Some bounced around a theory that it was an attempt to clean up the search results, but Google&#8217;s never really had a problem with porn before, just guns and booze. Besides, if somebody were searching for some of the competitive terms listed at SEOBlackHat.com, relevancy should rule over prudishness. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Some bounced around a theory that it was an attempt to clean up the search results, but Google&#8217;s never really had a problem with porn before, just guns and booze. Besides, if somebody were searching for some of the competitive terms listed at SEOBlackHat.com, relevancy should rule over prudishness. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Body Impolitic - Blog Archive - &#187; Missing Links - Laurie Toby Edison: Photographer</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/11/21/free-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-5259</link>
		<dc:creator>Body Impolitic - Blog Archive - &#187; Missing Links - Laurie Toby Edison: Photographer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 00:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2006/11/21/free-porn/#comment-5259</guid>
		<description>[...] And here at home, Susie Bright notes that everyone&#8217;s favorite search engine quietly changed its search engine policies regarding porn a few weeks ago. The new policies are designed to make sure that no one gets to a porn site by accident &#8230; which of course makes it more difficult to get to one on purpose. Sign of the times. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And here at home, Susie Bright notes that everyone&#8217;s favorite search engine quietly changed its search engine policies regarding porn a few weeks ago. The new policies are designed to make sure that no one gets to a porn site by accident &#8230; which of course makes it more difficult to get to one on purpose. Sign of the times. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Britney Spears Naked</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/11/21/free-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-5227</link>
		<dc:creator>Britney Spears Naked</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 23:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2006/11/21/free-porn/#comment-5227</guid>
		<description>[...] I very much doubt this domain will rank for Britney-anything, although if it did, it would probably be a source of amusement for John Scott. However I do think SEOBlackhat is onto something&#8230;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I very much doubt this domain will rank for Britney-anything, although if it did, it would probably be a source of amusement for John Scott. However I do think SEOBlackhat is onto something&#8230;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Radical Vixen &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Censors Porn?</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/11/21/free-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-5209</link>
		<dc:creator>Radical Vixen &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Censors Porn?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 09:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2006/11/21/free-porn/#comment-5209</guid>
		<description>[...] SEOBlackHat gives a good summary of the situation: Dude, Where’s My Free Porn? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SEOBlackHat gives a good summary of the situation: Dude, Where’s My Free Porn? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog Intercambios-Enlaces.com &#187; Google Censor</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/11/21/free-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-5197</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Intercambios-Enlaces.com &#187; Google Censor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 17:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2006/11/21/free-porn/#comment-5197</guid>
		<description>[...] Ahora en serio, al parecer Google de la noche a la mañana ha aplicado un filtro a sus resultados que está reduciendo mucho el número de resultados porno entre los primeros puestos de resultados para búsquedas porno.[...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ahora en serio, al parecer Google de la noche a la mañana ha aplicado un filtro a sus resultados que está reduciendo mucho el número de resultados porno entre los primeros puestos de resultados para búsquedas porno.[...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian&#8217;s Business Blog &#187; Google update in progress</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2006/11/21/free-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-5143</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian&#8217;s Business Blog &#187; Google update in progress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 23:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2006/11/21/free-porn/#comment-5143</guid>
		<description>[...] However, Black Hat SEO posted that the week before Google had begun shifting adult keywords out from generic searches. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] However, Black Hat SEO posted that the week before Google had begun shifting adult keywords out from generic searches. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

