<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inside Scoop on the Defusing of Google Bombs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seoblackhat.com/2007/01/28/google-bomb-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2007/01/28/google-bomb-update/</link>
	<description>Tired of useless Top 10 Lists for ranking in Google? Looking for effective and insightful info? SEO Black Hat Blog offers articles on Blackhat SEO, Linkbait &#038; Link Spamming. And if you need to escape White Hat SEO Whiners, check out he Private Black Hat Search Engine Optimization Forum.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:26:23 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: stefanjuhl</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2007/01/28/google-bomb-update/comment-page-1/#comment-5825</link>
		<dc:creator>stefanjuhl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 12:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2007/01/28/google-bomb-update/#comment-5825</guid>
		<description>bpcombs, yes as I wrote in my comment: &quot;It appears that my typo optimization hasn’t been affected at all.&quot; - meaning that I still have rankings for keywords that aren&#039;t anywhere on the page (actually not even on the site..).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bpcombs, yes as I wrote in my comment: &#8220;It appears that my typo optimization hasn’t been affected at all.&#8221; &#8211; meaning that I still have rankings for keywords that aren&#8217;t anywhere on the page (actually not even on the site..).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bpcombs</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2007/01/28/google-bomb-update/comment-page-1/#comment-5814</link>
		<dc:creator>bpcombs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 22:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2007/01/28/google-bomb-update/#comment-5814</guid>
		<description>I too have written about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.apogee-search.com/Blog/?p=440&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the death of Googlebombs&lt;/a&gt;. My current theory is that Google has taken what amounted to an addititve algo (on-page factors *plus* off-page factors) and changed it to a multiplicative algo (on-page factors *times* off-page factors).

Clearly, you don&#039;t have to have keyword stuffed links to rank (for non-competitive keywords), but it does seem that at least some minimal on-page usage is required (e.g. an on-page of zero erases any keywords coming from links).

Has anyone seen cases of pages still ranking for key phrases that weren&#039;t on the page? If so, I&#039;d very much like to hear about it.

Thanks in advance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too have written about <a href="http://www.apogee-search.com/Blog/?p=440" rel="nofollow">the death of Googlebombs</a>. My current theory is that Google has taken what amounted to an addititve algo (on-page factors *plus* off-page factors) and changed it to a multiplicative algo (on-page factors *times* off-page factors).</p>
<p>Clearly, you don&#8217;t have to have keyword stuffed links to rank (for non-competitive keywords), but it does seem that at least some minimal on-page usage is required (e.g. an on-page of zero erases any keywords coming from links).</p>
<p>Has anyone seen cases of pages still ranking for key phrases that weren&#8217;t on the page? If so, I&#8217;d very much like to hear about it.</p>
<p>Thanks in advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Drops Da Bomb On Googlebombing - TheVanBlog</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2007/01/28/google-bomb-update/comment-page-1/#comment-5794</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Drops Da Bomb On Googlebombing - TheVanBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 03:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2007/01/28/google-bomb-update/#comment-5794</guid>
		<description>[...] Inside Scoop on the Defusing of Google Bombs [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Inside Scoop on the Defusing of Google Bombs [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sitebuddy.info</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2007/01/28/google-bomb-update/comment-page-1/#comment-5784</link>
		<dc:creator>sitebuddy.info</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 18:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2007/01/28/google-bomb-update/#comment-5784</guid>
		<description>[...] Here is the commentary from SEOBlackHat: http://seoblackhat.com/2007/01/28/google-bomb-update/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Here is the commentary from SEOBlackHat: <a href="http://seoblackhat.com/2007/01/28/google-bomb-update/" rel="nofollow">http://seoblackhat.com/2007/01/28/google-bomb-update/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: keemo</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2007/01/28/google-bomb-update/comment-page-1/#comment-5766</link>
		<dc:creator>keemo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 22:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2007/01/28/google-bomb-update/#comment-5766</guid>
		<description>Ok so something like &quot;free international calls&quot; for actiontelecom.co.uk should be alright...but not fuckwit for Bush&#039;s homepage :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok so something like &#8220;free international calls&#8221; for actiontelecom.co.uk should be alright&#8230;but not fuckwit for Bush&#8217;s homepage <img src='http://seoblackhat.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stefanjuhl</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2007/01/28/google-bomb-update/comment-page-1/#comment-5748</link>
		<dc:creator>stefanjuhl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 16:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2007/01/28/google-bomb-update/#comment-5748</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve often solely used external links to rank for typical typos and misspellings. So when Google announced that they were &quot;diffusing&quot; googlebombs I feared they&#039;d screw it up by being too strict about on-page factors that would match anchor texts. It appears that my typo optimization hasn&#039;t been affected at all. I haven&#039;t really decided what to make of this but I&#039;d suggest that googlebombing might still be possible to some degree.

Note that the typos doesn&#039;t seem to be detected as such by Google since it does not show the &quot;did you mean..&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve often solely used external links to rank for typical typos and misspellings. So when Google announced that they were &#8220;diffusing&#8221; googlebombs I feared they&#8217;d screw it up by being too strict about on-page factors that would match anchor texts. It appears that my typo optimization hasn&#8217;t been affected at all. I haven&#8217;t really decided what to make of this but I&#8217;d suggest that googlebombing might still be possible to some degree.</p>
<p>Note that the typos doesn&#8217;t seem to be detected as such by Google since it does not show the &#8220;did you mean..&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
