<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Phrase Based Indexing and Retrieval Spam Detection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seoblackhat.com/2007/02/11/phrase-based-indexing-and-retrieval-spam-detection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2007/02/11/phrase-based-indexing-and-retrieval-spam-detection/</link>
	<description>Tired of useless Top 10 Lists for ranking in Google? Looking for effective and insightful info? SEO Black Hat Blog offers articles on Blackhat SEO, Linkbait &#38; Link Spamming. And if you need to escape White Hat SEO Whiners, check out he Private Black Hat Search Engine Optimization Forum.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 05:07:23 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SEO Consultant - Shimon Sandler &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 14 Methods to Hide Text</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2007/02/11/phrase-based-indexing-and-retrieval-spam-detection/comment-page-1/#comment-7108</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Consultant - Shimon Sandler &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 14 Methods to Hide Text</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 16:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2007/02/11/phrase-based-indexing-and-retrieval-spam-detection/#comment-7108</guid>
		<description>[...] So, if you want to test how well a Black hat technique like hiding text on a webpage can be, then you should buy a throwaway domain (one you don&#8217;t care about), and use it as a testing ground. Make sure the Whois info is different from your primary domains. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So, if you want to test how well a Black hat technique like hiding text on a webpage can be, then you should buy a throwaway domain (one you don&#8217;t care about), and use it as a testing ground. Make sure the Whois info is different from your primary domains. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to Stay Out of Google Supplemental Results (or Pull Yourself Out) &#124; Blog Posts</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2007/02/11/phrase-based-indexing-and-retrieval-spam-detection/comment-page-1/#comment-6035</link>
		<dc:creator>How to Stay Out of Google Supplemental Results (or Pull Yourself Out) &#124; Blog Posts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2007/02/11/phrase-based-indexing-and-retrieval-spam-detection/#comment-6035</guid>
		<description>[...] So that wraps up today&#8217;s post on supplemental results. Hold on, wait a minute, there&#8217;s a strange force pulling me to link to this post from Quadszilla&#8230; Phrase Based Indexing and Retrieval Spam Detection. I don&#8217;t understand it fully but it gets me all black hat tingly. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So that wraps up today&#8217;s post on supplemental results. Hold on, wait a minute, there&#8217;s a strange force pulling me to link to this post from Quadszilla&#8230; Phrase Based Indexing and Retrieval Spam Detection. I don&#8217;t understand it fully but it gets me all black hat tingly. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thegypsy</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2007/02/11/phrase-based-indexing-and-retrieval-spam-detection/comment-page-1/#comment-5999</link>
		<dc:creator>thegypsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 16:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2007/02/11/phrase-based-indexing-and-retrieval-spam-detection/#comment-5999</guid>
		<description>Hey dOOd - glad to see some more interest (Dave from Reliable here). Recently Bill (slawski) did some work on it and there is even a couple threads on it now at WMW (yea yea fishing weenie land). I have to think tho, as mentioned more than a few times, that it is merely in addition to current Spam filters ( you know - watching fer link spam). So it&#039;s more of a double barrel approach (funnel).

If you have some tin-foil, make a hat and check out this; http://www.huomah.com/search-engines/algorithm-matters/phrase-based-bomb-buster.html

A little conspiracy theory (on my Blog) involving PaIR and GoogleBOmbs.

L8TR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey dOOd &#8211; glad to see some more interest (Dave from Reliable here). Recently Bill (slawski) did some work on it and there is even a couple threads on it now at WMW (yea yea fishing weenie land). I have to think tho, as mentioned more than a few times, that it is merely in addition to current Spam filters ( you know &#8211; watching fer link spam). So it&#8217;s more of a double barrel approach (funnel).</p>
<p>If you have some tin-foil, make a hat and check out this; <a href="http://www.huomah.com/search-engines/algorithm-matters/phrase-based-bomb-buster.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.huomah.com/search-engines/algorithm-matters/phrase-based-bomb-buster.html</a></p>
<p>A little conspiracy theory (on my Blog) involving PaIR and GoogleBOmbs.</p>
<p>L8TR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

