<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Exposing their Flank to Wikipedia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seoblackhat.com/2007/08/12/google-exposing-thier-flank-to-wikipedia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2007/08/12/google-exposing-thier-flank-to-wikipedia/</link>
	<description>Tired of useless Top 10 Lists for ranking in Google? Looking for effective and insightful info? SEO Black Hat Blog offers articles on Blackhat SEO, Linkbait &#038; Link Spamming. And if you need to escape White Hat SEO Whiners, check out he Private Black Hat Search Engine Optimization Forum.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 21:27:50 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cabrino Simone's Blog</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2007/08/12/google-exposing-thier-flank-to-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-7252</link>
		<dc:creator>Cabrino Simone's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 00:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2007/08/12/google-exposing-thier-flank-to-wikipedia/#comment-7252</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Google bannerà i risultati di Wikipedia?&lt;/strong&gt;

In un post datato 12 agosto 2007 e intitolato Google Exposing their Flank to Wikipedia, SEO BlackHat proponeva una riflessione, correlata dei dati di ricerca, per permetterci di ragionare su un semplice, ma ambiguo, grottesco e grosso paradigma che inv...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Google bannerà i risultati di Wikipedia?</strong></p>
<p>In un post datato 12 agosto 2007 e intitolato Google Exposing their Flank to Wikipedia, SEO BlackHat proponeva una riflessione, correlata dei dati di ricerca, per permetterci di ragionare su un semplice, ma ambiguo, grottesco e grosso paradigma che inv&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Muskie</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2007/08/12/google-exposing-thier-flank-to-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-7230</link>
		<dc:creator>Muskie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 03:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2007/08/12/google-exposing-thier-flank-to-wikipedia/#comment-7230</guid>
		<description>Wikipedia is sometimes wrong, of course the rest of the Google results are sometimes wrong.  There have been some minor scandals at the Wikipedia already, it is banned in China, or is frequently banned in China, it is still reliant on volunteer labor, and it needs someone to pay for all its bandwidth.  Donationware is far from a sure thing.

I think Google is safe from the Wikipedia for now and in the near future.  If you want to find the answer to something you google it.  You don&#039;t immediately go to Wikipedia.com, is there even a wikipedia.com?  I always google to get to Wikipedia, I do however link to it frequently when I think it has the best information about a topic I am interested in.

It would be interesting to see if some SEOs could infiltrate Wikipedia, I&#039;m sure some have already tried.  I believe I registered and corrected one factual mistake in one article once...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wikipedia is sometimes wrong, of course the rest of the Google results are sometimes wrong.  There have been some minor scandals at the Wikipedia already, it is banned in China, or is frequently banned in China, it is still reliant on volunteer labor, and it needs someone to pay for all its bandwidth.  Donationware is far from a sure thing.</p>
<p>I think Google is safe from the Wikipedia for now and in the near future.  If you want to find the answer to something you google it.  You don&#8217;t immediately go to Wikipedia.com, is there even a wikipedia.com?  I always google to get to Wikipedia, I do however link to it frequently when I think it has the best information about a topic I am interested in.</p>
<p>It would be interesting to see if some SEOs could infiltrate Wikipedia, I&#8217;m sure some have already tried.  I believe I registered and corrected one factual mistake in one article once&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Wikipedia Contaminou o Google?</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2007/08/12/google-exposing-thier-flank-to-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-7163</link>
		<dc:creator>A Wikipedia Contaminou o Google?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 20:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2007/08/12/google-exposing-thier-flank-to-wikipedia/#comment-7163</guid>
		<description>[...] Parece que mais gente se incomoda com isso, hoje me deparei com esse artigo que comenta a presença da Wikipedia nas buscas do Google. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Parece que mais gente se incomoda com isso, hoje me deparei com esse artigo que comenta a presença da Wikipedia nas buscas do Google. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Il motore di ricerca di Wikipedia - Wikia</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2007/08/12/google-exposing-thier-flank-to-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-7155</link>
		<dc:creator>Il motore di ricerca di Wikipedia - Wikia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 19:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2007/08/12/google-exposing-thier-flank-to-wikipedia/#comment-7155</guid>
		<description>[...] Ora, &#232; noto che Wiki sta sviluppando un suo motore di ricerca, Wikia, assolutamente Open Source, pronto a sfidare Google. Lo si pu&#242; leggere su webmasterpoint, su macitynet e sullo stesso black hat seo. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ora, &egrave; noto che Wiki sta sviluppando un suo motore di ricerca, Wikia, assolutamente Open Source, pronto a sfidare Google. Lo si pu&ograve; leggere su webmasterpoint, su macitynet e sullo stesso black hat seo. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Atilla</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2007/08/12/google-exposing-thier-flank-to-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-7139</link>
		<dc:creator>Atilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2007/08/12/google-exposing-thier-flank-to-wikipedia/#comment-7139</guid>
		<description>Will they end up like the OS/2?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will they end up like the OS/2?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; SEOs and Social Media - The New World is Not Big EnoughSearch Engine Optimization Blog - SEO News and Opinion</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2007/08/12/google-exposing-thier-flank-to-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-7136</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; SEOs and Social Media - The New World is Not Big EnoughSearch Engine Optimization Blog - SEO News and Opinion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2007/08/12/google-exposing-thier-flank-to-wikipedia/#comment-7136</guid>
		<description>[...] There are a number of complaints in the SEO sector about high ranking Wikipedia listings found in the Google SERPs. With one spot virtually guaranteed to Wikipedia, competition for the remaining nine placements is that much more difficult. Earlier today, SEO Black Hat posted a list of the 15 top searches done by New York Times readers in the past 30-days. They compared that list with the placement of a Wikipedia listing in Google search results. Here is what they found: (full list: Google Exposing their Flank to Wikipedia) &#8220;The wikipedia came in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There are a number of complaints in the SEO sector about high ranking Wikipedia listings found in the Google SERPs. With one spot virtually guaranteed to Wikipedia, competition for the remaining nine placements is that much more difficult. Earlier today, SEO Black Hat posted a list of the 15 top searches done by New York Times readers in the past 30-days. They compared that list with the placement of a Wikipedia listing in Google search results. Here is what they found: (full list: Google Exposing their Flank to Wikipedia) &#8220;The wikipedia came in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JeremyL</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2007/08/12/google-exposing-thier-flank-to-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-7135</link>
		<dc:creator>JeremyL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2007/08/12/google-exposing-thier-flank-to-wikipedia/#comment-7135</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see this as a replay of IBM &amp; MsDOS. I instead see this as a replay of something more recent. Yahoo Search powered by Google! Look where that got Google. So if Google creating their own biggest competitor?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see this as a replay of IBM &amp; MsDOS. I instead see this as a replay of something more recent. Yahoo Search powered by Google! Look where that got Google. So if Google creating their own biggest competitor?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.090 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-02-25 09:07:42 -->
