<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Block Port 25 on Wifi? Here&#8217;s The Work Around to Send email</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seoblackhat.com/2007/10/11/block-port-25-on-wifi-heres-the-work-around-to-send-email/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2007/10/11/block-port-25-on-wifi-heres-the-work-around-to-send-email/</link>
	<description>Tired of useless Top 10 Lists for ranking in Google? Looking for effective and insightful info? SEO Black Hat Blog offers articles on Blackhat SEO, Linkbait &#38; Link Spamming. And if you need to escape White Hat SEO Whiners, check out he Private Black Hat Search Engine Optimization Forum.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 05:07:23 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: esoomllub</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2007/10/11/block-port-25-on-wifi-heres-the-work-around-to-send-email/comment-page-1/#comment-7465</link>
		<dc:creator>esoomllub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 13:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2007/10/11/block-port-25-on-wifi-heres-the-work-around-to-send-email/#comment-7465</guid>
		<description>Dude... as black hat as you are, do you really want your emails, along with usernames and passwords, going cleartext on some silly wifi connection?  Switch to an encrypted port, say... 465 for outgoing, 995 for incoming... so that people like who like to experiment with capturing wifi packets don&#039;t compromise your emails, usernames and passwords (ditto FTP).  Not that I&#039;d do that, but I have been know to experiment with different network tools.

It seems that many hosts are actually set up to handle these ports using SSL (in my experience) and more importantly I&#039;ve never been blocked on a wifi connection or even a wired connection for that matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude&#8230; as black hat as you are, do you really want your emails, along with usernames and passwords, going cleartext on some silly wifi connection?  Switch to an encrypted port, say&#8230; 465 for outgoing, 995 for incoming&#8230; so that people like who like to experiment with capturing wifi packets don&#8217;t compromise your emails, usernames and passwords (ditto FTP).  Not that I&#8217;d do that, but I have been know to experiment with different network tools.</p>
<p>It seems that many hosts are actually set up to handle these ports using SSL (in my experience) and more importantly I&#8217;ve never been blocked on a wifi connection or even a wired connection for that matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gatekeeper</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2007/10/11/block-port-25-on-wifi-heres-the-work-around-to-send-email/comment-page-1/#comment-7391</link>
		<dc:creator>Gatekeeper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 17:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2007/10/11/block-port-25-on-wifi-heres-the-work-around-to-send-email/#comment-7391</guid>
		<description>When I was a kid we used to use Putty to drill an SSL tunnel to our computer back at home to do stuff like this. Our skrewl had blocked ICQ you see, and that was intolerable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I was a kid we used to use Putty to drill an SSL tunnel to our computer back at home to do stuff like this. Our skrewl had blocked ICQ you see, and that was intolerable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

