<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reciprocal Links &#8211; Still Working Great in Moderation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seoblackhat.com/2007/10/16/reciprocal-links-still-working-great-in-moderation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2007/10/16/reciprocal-links-still-working-great-in-moderation/</link>
	<description>Tired of useless Top 10 Lists for ranking in Google? Looking for effective and insightful info? SEO Black Hat Blog offers articles on Blackhat SEO, Linkbait &#38; Link Spamming. And if you need to escape White Hat SEO Whiners, check out he Private Black Hat Search Engine Optimization Forum.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 05:07:23 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SomerZ</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2007/10/16/reciprocal-links-still-working-great-in-moderation/comment-page-1/#comment-7544</link>
		<dc:creator>SomerZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 21:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2007/10/16/reciprocal-links-still-working-great-in-moderation/#comment-7544</guid>
		<description>I know this is a month old, but I thought developments on the original poster&#039;s site were interesting.  This &quot;experiment&quot; was actually first posted by Stoney deGeyter over at searchengineguide.com (minstrel at digitalpoint just copied and reposted it with a link to the original).  Now, they&#039;ve posted a &quot;letter of surrender&quot; in response to Google&#039;s threats of punishment for paid links--in this case, advertising on searchengineguide.com&#039;s site.

I&#039;m really new to SEO, so I&#039;m confused.  Google can&#039;t distinguish paid links from exchanged links--which is like paying links with links--right?

So....is there some kind of magic number of exchanged links you don&#039;t want to go over for fear of drawing negative google attention?

Thanks for the info and I&#039;m enjoying the blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this is a month old, but I thought developments on the original poster&#8217;s site were interesting.  This &#8220;experiment&#8221; was actually first posted by Stoney deGeyter over at searchengineguide.com (minstrel at digitalpoint just copied and reposted it with a link to the original).  Now, they&#8217;ve posted a &#8220;letter of surrender&#8221; in response to Google&#8217;s threats of punishment for paid links&#8211;in this case, advertising on searchengineguide.com&#8217;s site.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m really new to SEO, so I&#8217;m confused.  Google can&#8217;t distinguish paid links from exchanged links&#8211;which is like paying links with links&#8211;right?</p>
<p>So&#8230;.is there some kind of magic number of exchanged links you don&#8217;t want to go over for fear of drawing negative google attention?</p>
<p>Thanks for the info and I&#8217;m enjoying the blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Richardson</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2007/10/16/reciprocal-links-still-working-great-in-moderation/comment-page-1/#comment-7482</link>
		<dc:creator>William Richardson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 05:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2007/10/16/reciprocal-links-still-working-great-in-moderation/#comment-7482</guid>
		<description>Good to feel while reading this post. i do agree that Reciprocal Links are  Good in SEO. but this Reciprocal links exchange should be done only in content pages of website not in link page or resource page.The Crawlers visiting website, crawls the content of the website. so its better to do link exchange in content page of website. also see to that the website to which we are exchanging link should not supposed to have more external links say more than 30 links. its really an effective condition to apply while doing reciprocal link exchange coz website having more external links will get spammed by Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to feel while reading this post. i do agree that Reciprocal Links are  Good in SEO. but this Reciprocal links exchange should be done only in content pages of website not in link page or resource page.The Crawlers visiting website, crawls the content of the website. so its better to do link exchange in content page of website. also see to that the website to which we are exchanging link should not supposed to have more external links say more than 30 links. its really an effective condition to apply while doing reciprocal link exchange coz website having more external links will get spammed by Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Link Exchanges: Link Outside of the Box SEOisEZ.com: Blogging the Best of SEO</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2007/10/16/reciprocal-links-still-working-great-in-moderation/comment-page-1/#comment-7433</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Link Exchanges: Link Outside of the Box SEOisEZ.com: Blogging the Best of SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 05:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2007/10/16/reciprocal-links-still-working-great-in-moderation/#comment-7433</guid>
		<description>[...] To prove my point read this study on the effects of site relevant reciprocal links Take a look at this analysis of Google&#8217;s own patent Or just look at your average everyday pair of blogrolls. They&#8217;re full of recips. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] To prove my point read this study on the effects of site relevant reciprocal links Take a look at this analysis of Google&#8217;s own patent Or just look at your average everyday pair of blogrolls. They&#8217;re full of recips. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mary01</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2007/10/16/reciprocal-links-still-working-great-in-moderation/comment-page-1/#comment-7408</link>
		<dc:creator>mary01</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 02:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2007/10/16/reciprocal-links-still-working-great-in-moderation/#comment-7408</guid>
		<description>if you believe anything matt cutts says you doomed.... its like he is the politician for google.....seriously did anyone believe anything george bush said ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if you believe anything matt cutts says you doomed&#8230;. its like he is the politician for google&#8230;..seriously did anyone believe anything george bush said ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mary01</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2007/10/16/reciprocal-links-still-working-great-in-moderation/comment-page-1/#comment-7407</link>
		<dc:creator>mary01</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 02:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2007/10/16/reciprocal-links-still-working-great-in-moderation/#comment-7407</guid>
		<description>if you believe anything matt cutts says you doomed.... its like he is the politician for google.....seriously did anyone believe anything geroge bush said ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if you believe anything matt cutts says you doomed&#8230;. its like he is the politician for google&#8230;..seriously did anyone believe anything geroge bush said ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: egonitron</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2007/10/16/reciprocal-links-still-working-great-in-moderation/comment-page-1/#comment-7402</link>
		<dc:creator>egonitron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2007/10/16/reciprocal-links-still-working-great-in-moderation/#comment-7402</guid>
		<description>Interesting. I have to admit I was apprehensive about putting reciprocal links on my sites that I cared about because of the effects, so it&#039;s good to have this cleared up. Although I&#039;m sure Mr Cutts is a regular reader here, so we&#039;ll see how long this lasts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. I have to admit I was apprehensive about putting reciprocal links on my sites that I cared about because of the effects, so it&#8217;s good to have this cleared up. Although I&#8217;m sure Mr Cutts is a regular reader here, so we&#8217;ll see how long this lasts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

