<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Excerpts from Google Reviewer Guidlines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seoblackhat.com/2008/03/10/excerpts-from-google-reviewer-guidlines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2008/03/10/excerpts-from-google-reviewer-guidlines/</link>
	<description>Tired of useless Top 10 Lists for ranking in Google? Looking for effective and insightful info? SEO Black Hat Blog offers articles on Blackhat SEO, Linkbait &#038; Link Spamming. And if you need to escape White Hat SEO Whiners, check out he Private Black Hat Search Engine Optimization Forum.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 17:07:24 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ASP.NET Web site development, web developer &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Are Google Search Results Changing?</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2008/03/10/excerpts-from-google-reviewer-guidlines/comment-page-1/#comment-8521</link>
		<dc:creator>ASP.NET Web site development, web developer &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Are Google Search Results Changing?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 21:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2008/03/10/excerpts-from-google-reviewer-guidlines/#comment-8521</guid>
		<description>[...] Another alterantive is that Google is relying more and more on human reviewers to police the content of it&#8217;s index and make adjustments. This then brings a human element to the placement of your web page in the index. Here&#8217;s a link to a couple of excerpts of the reviewers guide. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Another alterantive is that Google is relying more and more on human reviewers to police the content of it&#8217;s index and make adjustments. This then brings a human element to the placement of your web page in the index. Here&#8217;s a link to a couple of excerpts of the reviewers guide. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO &#124; Zoekmachine Optimalisatie Weblog &#187; Google’s confidentiële “Guidelines for Raters - 2007” uitgelekt</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2008/03/10/excerpts-from-google-reviewer-guidlines/comment-page-1/#comment-8143</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO &#124; Zoekmachine Optimalisatie Weblog &#187; Google’s confidentiële “Guidelines for Raters - 2007” uitgelekt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 13:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2008/03/10/excerpts-from-google-reviewer-guidlines/#comment-8143</guid>
		<description>[...] Als eerst zag ik SEO Black Hat die erover ging praten en hoe je het in hun peperdure forum kon vinden voor download (natuurlijk tegen een betaling van 100 USD, seriously? – maar gelukkig bij deze kwam de aap snel uit de mouw). Daarna zag ik (ja, bijna overal eigenlijk) Aaron Wall die erover sprak, en toen nog &#8217;s (daarna nog vaker zelfs). Toen ook deze website en ja, ik dacht van, waarom ik ook niet – vooral voor de achter het net vissers? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Als eerst zag ik SEO Black Hat die erover ging praten en hoe je het in hun peperdure forum kon vinden voor download (natuurlijk tegen een betaling van 100 USD, seriously? – maar gelukkig bij deze kwam de aap snel uit de mouw). Daarna zag ik (ja, bijna overal eigenlijk) Aaron Wall die erover sprak, en toen nog &#8217;s (daarna nog vaker zelfs). Toen ook deze website en ja, ik dacht van, waarom ik ook niet – vooral voor de achter het net vissers? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MORO</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2008/03/10/excerpts-from-google-reviewer-guidlines/comment-page-1/#comment-8017</link>
		<dc:creator>MORO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 19:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2008/03/10/excerpts-from-google-reviewer-guidlines/#comment-8017</guid>
		<description>Just wondering if anyone knows the extent to which Google is applying the &quot;ratings&quot; to rankings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wondering if anyone knows the extent to which Google is applying the &#8220;ratings&#8221; to rankings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quality Rating: la guida di Google, svelata &#124; News &#124; Blog di Petro</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2008/03/10/excerpts-from-google-reviewer-guidlines/comment-page-1/#comment-8006</link>
		<dc:creator>Quality Rating: la guida di Google, svelata &#124; News &#124; Blog di Petro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2008/03/10/excerpts-from-google-reviewer-guidlines/#comment-8006</guid>
		<description>[...] Il blog SeoBlackHat ha annunciato pochi giorni or sono di essere entrato in possesso di un documento di Google, che avrebbe dovuto essere confidenziale e ad uso esclusivo dei Quality Rater - anche Aaron Wall ha ripreso la notizia. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Il blog SeoBlackHat ha annunciato pochi giorni or sono di essere entrato in possesso di un documento di Google, che avrebbe dovuto essere confidenziale e ad uso esclusivo dei Quality Rater &#8211; anche Aaron Wall ha ripreso la notizia. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet, Travel, Life, Computer Powered by Travel China Planner</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2008/03/10/excerpts-from-google-reviewer-guidlines/comment-page-1/#comment-8003</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet, Travel, Life, Computer Powered by Travel China Planner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2008/03/10/excerpts-from-google-reviewer-guidlines/#comment-8003</guid>
		<description>[...] For organic search junkies the Google Gods have tossed us another gift. An SEO Black Hat member discovered an April 2007 Google Evaluation Guidelines document, referenced here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For organic search junkies the Google Gods have tossed us another gift. An SEO Black Hat member discovered an April 2007 Google Evaluation Guidelines document, referenced here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Sucks</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2008/03/10/excerpts-from-google-reviewer-guidlines/comment-page-1/#comment-7999</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Sucks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2008/03/10/excerpts-from-google-reviewer-guidlines/#comment-7999</guid>
		<description>I cannot prove that this was from Google, but whilst trolling CraigsList I found a posting for a gig where you would review SERPs. You can read about it more at: http://googlesearchsucks.com/google-human-review-cought-red-handed/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cannot prove that this was from Google, but whilst trolling CraigsList I found a posting for a gig where you would review SERPs. You can read about it more at: <a href="http://googlesearchsucks.com/google-human-review-cought-red-handed/" rel="nofollow">http://googlesearchsucks.com/google-human-review-cought-red-handed/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deviant</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2008/03/10/excerpts-from-google-reviewer-guidlines/comment-page-1/#comment-7998</link>
		<dc:creator>deviant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2008/03/10/excerpts-from-google-reviewer-guidlines/#comment-7998</guid>
		<description>this is a tad worrysome for MFA sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is a tad worrysome for MFA sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryancaldwell</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2008/03/10/excerpts-from-google-reviewer-guidlines/comment-page-1/#comment-7995</link>
		<dc:creator>ryancaldwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2008/03/10/excerpts-from-google-reviewer-guidlines/#comment-7995</guid>
		<description>and Google is probably outsourcing this to people with poor discernment abilities, resulting in loads of false positives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and Google is probably outsourcing this to people with poor discernment abilities, resulting in loads of false positives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Must-Read Monday Links &#8212; Tropical SEO</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2008/03/10/excerpts-from-google-reviewer-guidlines/comment-page-1/#comment-7992</link>
		<dc:creator>Must-Read Monday Links &#8212; Tropical SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2008/03/10/excerpts-from-google-reviewer-guidlines/#comment-7992</guid>
		<description>[...] Excerpts from Google Reviewer at SEO Blackhat (and good for you if you have a membership to read the whole thing!) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Excerpts from Google Reviewer at SEO Blackhat (and good for you if you have a membership to read the whole thing!) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.138 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-02-23 17:17:30 -->
