<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spammy Links Are Good For . . .</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seoblackhat.com/2009/07/09/spammy-links-are-good-for/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2009/07/09/spammy-links-are-good-for/</link>
	<description>Tired of useless Top 10 Lists for ranking in Google? Looking for effective and insightful info? SEO Black Hat Blog offers articles on Blackhat SEO, Linkbait &#38; Link Spamming. And if you need to escape White Hat SEO Whiners, check out he Private Black Hat Search Engine Optimization Forum.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 05:07:23 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: How to Build Link Pyramids</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2009/07/09/spammy-links-are-good-for/comment-page-1/#comment-9959</link>
		<dc:creator>How to Build Link Pyramids</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2009/07/09/spammy-links-are-good-for/#comment-9959</guid>
		<description>[...] Yesterday, we discussed two of ways you can use bursts of spammy links to help you make money. But just because you have the ability to spam thousands of links a day to a single page doesn’t mean it’s the most effective use of the tool. What if I told you there is a way [&#8230;]       &#171; Spammy Links Are Good For . . . [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Yesterday, we discussed two of ways you can use bursts of spammy links to help you make money. But just because you have the ability to spam thousands of links a day to a single page doesn’t mean it’s the most effective use of the tool. What if I told you there is a way [&#8230;]       &laquo; Spammy Links Are Good For . . . [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sanjay</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2009/07/09/spammy-links-are-good-for/comment-page-1/#comment-9940</link>
		<dc:creator>Sanjay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 01:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2009/07/09/spammy-links-are-good-for/#comment-9940</guid>
		<description>You have really gave good knowledge by this post. Its pretty good post.
Thanks!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have really gave good knowledge by this post. Its pretty good post.<br />
Thanks!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QuadsZilla</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2009/07/09/spammy-links-are-good-for/comment-page-1/#comment-9938</link>
		<dc:creator>QuadsZilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 23:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2009/07/09/spammy-links-are-good-for/#comment-9938</guid>
		<description>RobertShew : Too many variables to answer that question.  Obviously, if your competitor is Amazon, you&#039;re not going to get their site banned with a few spammy links.  Careful about spamming links to a competior - you just might help them rank better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RobertShew : Too many variables to answer that question.  Obviously, if your competitor is Amazon, you&#8217;re not going to get their site banned with a few spammy links.  Careful about spamming links to a competior &#8211; you just might help them rank better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QuadsZilla</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2009/07/09/spammy-links-are-good-for/comment-page-1/#comment-9937</link>
		<dc:creator>QuadsZilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 23:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2009/07/09/spammy-links-are-good-for/#comment-9937</guid>
		<description>Birzu:  Companies are paying big money to have SERPs managed for the Brands: because the ROI for them is off the charts.  If you&#039;re brand is worth in the billions of dollars, there&#039;s no excuse not protecting that brand in Google SERPs with a few million per year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Birzu:  Companies are paying big money to have SERPs managed for the Brands: because the ROI for them is off the charts.  If you&#8217;re brand is worth in the billions of dollars, there&#8217;s no excuse not protecting that brand in Google SERPs with a few million per year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobertShew</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2009/07/09/spammy-links-are-good-for/comment-page-1/#comment-9936</link>
		<dc:creator>RobertShew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2009/07/09/spammy-links-are-good-for/#comment-9936</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this post. I&#039;ve spent my career trying to be a white-hat SEO. Your blog has really opened my mind to other things.

Let&#039;s say, I have a competitor who dominates my niche. Most of his back links are from Pay Per Post Blogging. If I pointed this tool/technique at his domain and used the worst spam words as anchor text, could that shoot him down in Google?

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this post. I&#8217;ve spent my career trying to be a white-hat SEO. Your blog has really opened my mind to other things.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s say, I have a competitor who dominates my niche. Most of his back links are from Pay Per Post Blogging. If I pointed this tool/technique at his domain and used the worst spam words as anchor text, could that shoot him down in Google?</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: protheus99</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2009/07/09/spammy-links-are-good-for/comment-page-1/#comment-9935</link>
		<dc:creator>protheus99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2009/07/09/spammy-links-are-good-for/#comment-9935</guid>
		<description>You have been away a long time, and throughout this time i kept you on my rss feed cause i knew you would come back with something like this.

I hope that not many people read this and even less do it because it works so well now, posts like these are really double edged swords.

Anyways this series is pretty good i will keep an eye out for part 3, how about doing some post on adult seo once in a while.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have been away a long time, and throughout this time i kept you on my rss feed cause i knew you would come back with something like this.</p>
<p>I hope that not many people read this and even less do it because it works so well now, posts like these are really double edged swords.</p>
<p>Anyways this series is pretty good i will keep an eye out for part 3, how about doing some post on adult seo once in a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: birzu.sergiu</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2009/07/09/spammy-links-are-good-for/comment-page-1/#comment-9933</link>
		<dc:creator>birzu.sergiu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2009/07/09/spammy-links-are-good-for/#comment-9933</guid>
		<description>Great post Quadszilla. This is the stuff we&#039;re used to read both on the blog and especially on the forum.
I like the Google Bowling idea because when it comes to your brand name you don&#039;t really want a #3-4 result which says company X sucks and uses spammy techniques to gain rankings.

There was this one case with Serenata flowers - read more here http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/organgrinder/2006/12/serenata_flowers_apologise_for.html which involved some spamy techniques and a very high ranking for Serenata flowers which said how much they suck lol.

That guy was helped by his friends (with a few authority domains) and really made them look bad... I know they could have invested a lot of money to fix the problem but i think apologizing is a solution also. Too bad you can&#039;t nuke those DAMN WIKI PAGES !!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Quadszilla. This is the stuff we&#8217;re used to read both on the blog and especially on the forum.<br />
I like the Google Bowling idea because when it comes to your brand name you don&#8217;t really want a #3-4 result which says company X sucks and uses spammy techniques to gain rankings.</p>
<p>There was this one case with Serenata flowers &#8211; read more here <a href="http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/organgrinder/2006/12/serenata_flowers_apologise_for.html" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/organgrinder/2006/12/serenata_flowers_apologise_for.html</a> which involved some spamy techniques and a very high ranking for Serenata flowers which said how much they suck lol.</p>
<p>That guy was helped by his friends (with a few authority domains) and really made them look bad&#8230; I know they could have invested a lot of money to fix the problem but i think apologizing is a solution also. Too bad you can&#8217;t nuke those DAMN WIKI PAGES !!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

