<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Follow Up Q&amp;A on Link Pyramids</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seoblackhat.com/2009/07/11/follow-up-qa-on-link-pyramids/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2009/07/11/follow-up-qa-on-link-pyramids/</link>
	<description>Tired of useless Top 10 Lists for ranking in Google? Looking for effective and insightful info? SEO Black Hat Blog offers articles on Blackhat SEO, Linkbait &#38; Link Spamming. And if you need to escape White Hat SEO Whiners, check out he Private Black Hat Search Engine Optimization Forum.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 05:07:23 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ashley</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2009/07/11/follow-up-qa-on-link-pyramids/comment-page-1/#comment-9993</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2009/07/11/follow-up-qa-on-link-pyramids/#comment-9993</guid>
		<description>Quads;

Thanks for the follow up.  I think I&#039;m starting to get a feel for the sort of scale you&#039;re talking about.

This is probably a whole other post topic, but can you explain how you create those bottom three layers of sites?  What automated tools do you use for 300K bottom layer sites?  Certainly it must be hard to create that many Squidoo lenses without some good automated tools.

So how do you create the 300K, 20K, and 800 sites? What automated tools do you use?  And what sort of content do you fill them with? Does it ever get updated?  Even managing 800 sites seems like a difficult thing.

And like a comment described above, you&#039;re saying that you have 20K domain names, right, for the second tier?  That&#039;s $160K / year (20K x $8 / domain). That&#039;s got to be a pretty lucrative niche to make that pay.

I know you&#039;d never want to describe your own sites but can you name some keywords that are dominated by this sort of strategy in the SERPs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quads;</p>
<p>Thanks for the follow up.  I think I&#8217;m starting to get a feel for the sort of scale you&#8217;re talking about.</p>
<p>This is probably a whole other post topic, but can you explain how you create those bottom three layers of sites?  What automated tools do you use for 300K bottom layer sites?  Certainly it must be hard to create that many Squidoo lenses without some good automated tools.</p>
<p>So how do you create the 300K, 20K, and 800 sites? What automated tools do you use?  And what sort of content do you fill them with? Does it ever get updated?  Even managing 800 sites seems like a difficult thing.</p>
<p>And like a comment described above, you&#8217;re saying that you have 20K domain names, right, for the second tier?  That&#8217;s $160K / year (20K x $8 / domain). That&#8217;s got to be a pretty lucrative niche to make that pay.</p>
<p>I know you&#8217;d never want to describe your own sites but can you name some keywords that are dominated by this sort of strategy in the SERPs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reteep</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2009/07/11/follow-up-qa-on-link-pyramids/comment-page-1/#comment-9982</link>
		<dc:creator>reteep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 09:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2009/07/11/follow-up-qa-on-link-pyramids/#comment-9982</guid>
		<description>How much of a problem is the duplicate content stuff for the bottom layer autogenerated sites? Does it matter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much of a problem is the duplicate content stuff for the bottom layer autogenerated sites? Does it matter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karoshi</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2009/07/11/follow-up-qa-on-link-pyramids/comment-page-1/#comment-9981</link>
		<dc:creator>karoshi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 09:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2009/07/11/follow-up-qa-on-link-pyramids/#comment-9981</guid>
		<description>Hi Quads, awesome series of posts! One question though: For each level, what is the average time a site stays indexed (if done intelligently)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Quads, awesome series of posts! One question though: For each level, what is the average time a site stays indexed (if done intelligently)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: groneg</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2009/07/11/follow-up-qa-on-link-pyramids/comment-page-1/#comment-9979</link>
		<dc:creator>groneg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 23:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2009/07/11/follow-up-qa-on-link-pyramids/#comment-9979</guid>
		<description>sorry -- &quot;i CAN&#039;t envision the scale&quot;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry &#8212; &#8220;i CAN&#8217;t envision the scale&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: groneg</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2009/07/11/follow-up-qa-on-link-pyramids/comment-page-1/#comment-9978</link>
		<dc:creator>groneg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 23:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2009/07/11/follow-up-qa-on-link-pyramids/#comment-9978</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got the same ques as stewart.  I can envision the scale in my head.  How do you find time for the top layer (whitehat) &amp; the second layer. I assume the bottom 2 layers are autogeneratecd over time -- does the same go for  the authority/niche sites?

Also, you&#039;re talking &gt; $200K in just yearly registrar renewals? oomph.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got the same ques as stewart.  I can envision the scale in my head.  How do you find time for the top layer (whitehat) &amp; the second layer. I assume the bottom 2 layers are autogeneratecd over time &#8212; does the same go for  the authority/niche sites?</p>
<p>Also, you&#8217;re talking &gt; $200K in just yearly registrar renewals? oomph.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2009/07/11/follow-up-qa-on-link-pyramids/comment-page-1/#comment-9976</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 20:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2009/07/11/follow-up-qa-on-link-pyramids/#comment-9976</guid>
		<description>Good answers 

Are .infos/other cheap TLDs off limits for the bottom feeder type sites? How about subdomains off existing sites like wordpress.com?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good answers </p>
<p>Are .infos/other cheap TLDs off limits for the bottom feeder type sites? How about subdomains off existing sites like wordpress.com?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2009/07/11/follow-up-qa-on-link-pyramids/comment-page-1/#comment-9975</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 20:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2009/07/11/follow-up-qa-on-link-pyramids/#comment-9975</guid>
		<description>A registrar can&#039;t access private customer information of another registrar, when you use private registration your personal info only resides in your registrars customer database...which again is only accessible by your registrar.

It&#039;s impossible for Google to have access to your personal information when you use a private registration service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A registrar can&#8217;t access private customer information of another registrar, when you use private registration your personal info only resides in your registrars customer database&#8230;which again is only accessible by your registrar.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s impossible for Google to have access to your personal information when you use a private registration service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steward</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2009/07/11/follow-up-qa-on-link-pyramids/comment-page-1/#comment-9974</link>
		<dc:creator>Steward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 19:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2009/07/11/follow-up-qa-on-link-pyramids/#comment-9974</guid>
		<description>I wonder how you find time for the No. 1 Site of the pyramid. How do you manage your working time, can you give numbers for the different levels? And how many people work on the pyramid you described above? 

Thanks for sharing these ideas! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how you find time for the No. 1 Site of the pyramid. How do you manage your working time, can you give numbers for the different levels? And how many people work on the pyramid you described above? </p>
<p>Thanks for sharing these ideas! <img src='http://seoblackhat.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

