<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Petty Google on Bing Search Results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seoblackhat.com/2009/12/05/petty-google-on-bing-search-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2009/12/05/petty-google-on-bing-search-results/</link>
	<description>Tired of useless Top 10 Lists for ranking in Google? Looking for effective and insightful info? SEO Black Hat Blog offers articles on Blackhat SEO, Linkbait &#38; Link Spamming. And if you need to escape White Hat SEO Whiners, check out he Private Black Hat Search Engine Optimization Forum.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 05:07:23 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: evulvmedia</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2009/12/05/petty-google-on-bing-search-results/comment-page-1/#comment-10674</link>
		<dc:creator>evulvmedia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 13:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2009/12/05/petty-google-on-bing-search-results/#comment-10674</guid>
		<description>Ugh! I&#039;ll take BING over GOOGLE just to get rid of the fucking FADE!

You provided an invaluable tip some time ago with the http://www.google.com/ncr redirect-- do you know if there is another redirect to avoid the fade?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh! I&#8217;ll take BING over GOOGLE just to get rid of the fucking FADE!</p>
<p>You provided an invaluable tip some time ago with the <a href="http://www.google.com/ncr" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/ncr</a> redirect&#8211; do you know if there is another redirect to avoid the fade?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QuadsZilla</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2009/12/05/petty-google-on-bing-search-results/comment-page-1/#comment-10672</link>
		<dc:creator>QuadsZilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 09:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2009/12/05/petty-google-on-bing-search-results/#comment-10672</guid>
		<description>&quot;and I imagine she gets searched more than Bing does in Google. &quot;

Not a chance. (or am i being thick and you were being funny?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;and I imagine she gets searched more than Bing does in Google. &#8221;</p>
<p>Not a chance. (or am i being thick and you were being funny?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goosh2005</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2009/12/05/petty-google-on-bing-search-results/comment-page-1/#comment-10671</link>
		<dc:creator>Goosh2005</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 09:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2009/12/05/petty-google-on-bing-search-results/#comment-10671</guid>
		<description>Surely that is Google doing their job ?  The &quot;actress&quot; in that photo is called Carmella Bing and I imagine she gets searched more than Bing does in Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely that is Google doing their job ?  The &#8220;actress&#8221; in that photo is called Carmella Bing and I imagine she gets searched more than Bing does in Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Hampton</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2009/12/05/petty-google-on-bing-search-results/comment-page-1/#comment-10670</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Hampton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 02:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/2009/12/05/petty-google-on-bing-search-results/#comment-10670</guid>
		<description>Doesn&#039;t look like Google has done anything to the image search results; Bing is just irrelevant.

Microsoft has been trying to put together a successful search engine for years. Bing still has the same crappy results as its Live and MSN Search. It should, since there&#039;s nothing significantly new except the name.

The only thing that&#039;s likely to happen to Bing in 2010 is for it to fail miserably and be rebranded &lt;em&gt;again&lt;/em&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t look like Google has done anything to the image search results; Bing is just irrelevant.</p>
<p>Microsoft has been trying to put together a successful search engine for years. Bing still has the same crappy results as its Live and MSN Search. It should, since there&#8217;s nothing significantly new except the name.</p>
<p>The only thing that&#8217;s likely to happen to Bing in 2010 is for it to fail miserably and be rebranded <em>again</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

