<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why 6th Place in Search Might Soon Be a Player</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seoblackhat.com/2010/03/09/why-6th-place-in-search-might-soon-be-a-player/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2010/03/09/why-6th-place-in-search-might-soon-be-a-player/</link>
	<description>Tired of useless Top 10 Lists for ranking in Google? Looking for effective and insightful info? SEO Black Hat Blog offers articles on Blackhat SEO, Linkbait &#38; Link Spamming. And if you need to escape White Hat SEO Whiners, check out he Private Black Hat Search Engine Optimization Forum.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 05:07:23 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2010/03/09/why-6th-place-in-search-might-soon-be-a-player/comment-page-1/#comment-11735</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/?p=1309#comment-11735</guid>
		<description>I agree with this 100%.  Google cried its crocodile tears about Microsoft embedding desktop search into its operating system with no means of uninstalling it, and again about IE&#039;s so-called monopoly because Microsoft bundled it with their operating system.  

Well why is Google the default search engine on all these web browsers?  It&#039;s not because they&#039;re installed on Google&#039;s platform, it&#039;s because Google pays big bucks for this privilege.

Google&#039;s intention is to make it unclear to the layman what the difference is between the internet, the web, and Google.

The EU is ridiculous.  I&#039;m going to complain to them that 100% of people who live in Europe are European, which is anti-competitive, and demand that the federal governments mail out pamphlets to their citizens with invitations to move to other continents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with this 100%.  Google cried its crocodile tears about Microsoft embedding desktop search into its operating system with no means of uninstalling it, and again about IE&#8217;s so-called monopoly because Microsoft bundled it with their operating system.  </p>
<p>Well why is Google the default search engine on all these web browsers?  It&#8217;s not because they&#8217;re installed on Google&#8217;s platform, it&#8217;s because Google pays big bucks for this privilege.</p>
<p>Google&#8217;s intention is to make it unclear to the layman what the difference is between the internet, the web, and Google.</p>
<p>The EU is ridiculous.  I&#8217;m going to complain to them that 100% of people who live in Europe are European, which is anti-competitive, and demand that the federal governments mail out pamphlets to their citizens with invitations to move to other continents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dew&#124;frost</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2010/03/09/why-6th-place-in-search-might-soon-be-a-player/comment-page-1/#comment-11722</link>
		<dc:creator>dew&#124;frost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 18:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/?p=1309#comment-11722</guid>
		<description>BTW what happened with meta-search engines? They were all the rage some time ago. This would be as fair as it can get: not using one engine of election by using all of them. Or at least choosing more than one to use at once.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW what happened with meta-search engines? They were all the rage some time ago. This would be as fair as it can get: not using one engine of election by using all of them. Or at least choosing more than one to use at once.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marchamont</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2010/03/09/why-6th-place-in-search-might-soon-be-a-player/comment-page-1/#comment-11720</link>
		<dc:creator>Marchamont</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 15:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/?p=1309#comment-11720</guid>
		<description>Yup - a monopoly is a monopoly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup &#8211; a monopoly is a monopoly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QuadsZilla</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2010/03/09/why-6th-place-in-search-might-soon-be-a-player/comment-page-1/#comment-11719</link>
		<dc:creator>QuadsZilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 15:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/?p=1309#comment-11719</guid>
		<description>Because right now, if you download the other 5 browsers (Not just chrome), the default search settings are Google.  It may even be Google if you pick IE - I&#039;m not sure.

Users always had the choice of browsers, presumably they just weren&#039;t aware of it (or so the argument goes).  How could the same not be said of search engines?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because right now, if you download the other 5 browsers (Not just chrome), the default search settings are Google.  It may even be Google if you pick IE &#8211; I&#8217;m not sure.</p>
<p>Users always had the choice of browsers, presumably they just weren&#8217;t aware of it (or so the argument goes).  How could the same not be said of search engines?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordy Noll</title>
		<link>http://seoblackhat.com/2010/03/09/why-6th-place-in-search-might-soon-be-a-player/comment-page-1/#comment-11718</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordy Noll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoblackhat.com/?p=1309#comment-11718</guid>
		<description>Why exactly would it be fair?

EU forced MS with a reason to give the user a choice: More than 90% of the desktops/laptops are windows based.

But Chrome is only used by a good 6%, which isn&#039;t nearly enough to force Google in giving the user choice of which search engine to use. Plus, Chrome isn&#039;t a standard browser. People need to download it, accepting it as a Google product. Hence accepting Google as the standard search engine.

It&#039;s only obvious that a company like MS or Google would like to boost the use of their own product (Search engine), but in Google&#039;s case, I wouldn&#039;t worry too much about not being able to choose which search engine is standard...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why exactly would it be fair?</p>
<p>EU forced MS with a reason to give the user a choice: More than 90% of the desktops/laptops are windows based.</p>
<p>But Chrome is only used by a good 6%, which isn&#8217;t nearly enough to force Google in giving the user choice of which search engine to use. Plus, Chrome isn&#8217;t a standard browser. People need to download it, accepting it as a Google product. Hence accepting Google as the standard search engine.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s only obvious that a company like MS or Google would like to boost the use of their own product (Search engine), but in Google&#8217;s case, I wouldn&#8217;t worry too much about not being able to choose which search engine is standard&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

